ESG Rating Divergence and Green Bond Rremium: Evidence from China 's Bond Market

This paper examines the impact of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating disagreement on the green bond premium, using a sample of green bonds issued by Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2023. Employing a fixed effects regression model, we find that greater ESG rating disagreement significantly reduces the green bond premium. Mechanism analyses suggest that, consistent with limited attention theory, rating disagreement increases perceived information noise and distracts investors, thereby altering their information acquisition behavior. Further heterogeneity analyses reveal that the negative effect is more pronounced among firms in heavily polluting industries and those with high media exposure. These findings underscore the critical role of ESG rating consistency in the pricing of green bonds and offer policy implications for improving ESG rating quality and enhancing regulatory frameworks in the green finance market.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/zs43cd22
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG Rating Divergence and Green Bond Rremium: Evidence from China 's Bond Market

Wenyan Hu
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

ESG Rating Divergence and Green Bond Rremium: Evidence from China 's Bond Market

Wenyan Hu
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating disagreement on the green bond premium, using a sample of green bonds issued by Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2023. Employing a fixed effects regression model, we find that greater ESG rating disagreement significantly reduces the green bond premium. Mechanism analyses suggest that, consistent with limited attention theory, rating disagreement increases perceived information noise and distracts investors, thereby altering their information acquisition behavior. Further heterogeneity analyses reveal that the negative effect is more pronounced among firms in heavily polluting industries and those with high media exposure. These findings underscore the critical role of ESG rating consistency in the pricing of green bonds and offer policy implications for improving ESG rating quality and enhancing regulatory frameworks in the green finance market.

Highlights in Business Economics and ManagementVol. 62
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.