Exploring Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices toward Scientific Argumentation in Science Education <b></b>

Scientific argumentation has gained increasing attention as a powerful inquiry-based strategy that fosters students’ scientific literacy, critical thinking, and engagement with evidence-based reasoning—skills that are vital in today’s complex, information-rich world. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of secondary science teachers (SSTs) in Central Luzon, Philippines, regarding scientific argumentation within the evolving context of blended and remote learning environments. Using a mixed-methods descriptive research design, data were gathered from 190 SSTs through a validated self-reported survey (α = .81) and open-ended responses. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis, while qualitative responses were thematically examined using Quirkos software. Findings revealed that SSTs possess a very high level of knowledge of scientific argumentation, hold generally favorable attitudes—especially in terms of motivation and classroom engagement—and implement argumentation strategies to a great extent in their teaching. However, significant differences emerged based on demographic factors such as teaching experience, sex, and school type. Furthermore, strong positive correlations were found among teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices, highlighting the need for targeted professional development. Notably, limited resources and insufficient access to training emerged as barriers to consistent implementation. This study offers timely insights for policymakers, curriculum developers, and educators worldwide who are seeking to strengthen STEM education through discourse-rich, student-centered pedagogies. It underscores the importance of sustained teacher support, curriculum alignment, and resource accessibility in embedding scientific argumentation within diverse and increasingly digital learning landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Studies in Education
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.1942
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices toward Scientific Argumentation in Science Education

Ronilo P. Antonio
International Journal on Studies in Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Exploring Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices toward Scientific Argumentation in Science Education

Ronilo P. Antonio
article en

Abstract

Scientific argumentation has gained increasing attention as a powerful inquiry-based strategy that fosters students’ scientific literacy, critical thinking, and engagement with evidence-based reasoning—skills that are vital in today’s complex, information-rich world. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of secondary science teachers (SSTs) in Central Luzon, Philippines, regarding scientific argumentation within the evolving context of blended and remote learning environments. Using a mixed-methods descriptive research design, data were gathered from 190 SSTs through a validated self-reported survey (α = .81) and open-ended responses. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis, while qualitative responses were thematically examined using Quirkos software. Findings revealed that SSTs possess a very high level of knowledge of scientific argumentation, hold generally favorable attitudes—especially in terms of motivation and classroom engagement—and implement argumentation strategies to a great extent in their teaching. However, significant differences emerged based on demographic factors such as teaching experience, sex, and school type. Furthermore, strong positive correlations were found among teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices, highlighting the need for targeted professional development. Notably, limited resources and insufficient access to training emerged as barriers to consistent implementation. This study offers timely insights for policymakers, curriculum developers, and educators worldwide who are seeking to strengthen STEM education through discourse-rich, student-centered pedagogies. It underscores the importance of sustained teacher support, curriculum alignment, and resource accessibility in embedding scientific argumentation within diverse and increasingly digital learning landscapes.

International Journal on Studies in EducationVol. 7(4)
Bulacan State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices toward Scientific Argumentation in Science Education <b></b> — Ronilo P. Antonio · International Journal on Studies in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS