Impact of Residual Zwitterionic Surfactants on Topside Water–Oil Separation of Pre-Salt Light Crude Oil Emulsions

Zwitterionic surfactants have been used as foaming agents in Enhanced Oil Recovery due to their foamability, tolerance to reservoir conditions, low toxicity, and low adsorption on reservoir rocks. However, in the case of back-production, the impact of zwitterionic surfactants on water-in-crude oil (W/O) emulsions and produced water remains unclear, representing a knowledge gap in the field. The present study evaluated the effect of three commercial zwitterionic surfactants, at concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 ppm, on water-oil separation using a Brazilian Pre-Salt crude oil. Emulsion formation, separation kinetics, and water quality were assessed through bottle tests, droplet size microscopy, and oil-in-water content analysis. At the lowest concentration (50 ppm), these surfactants promoted coalescence and sedimentation of W/O emulsions faster than traditional nonionic and anionic surfactants. Separation kinetics increased as surfactant concentration increased up to 200 ppm, but concentrations above 500 ppm induced the formation of multiple emulsions (W/O/W). After 72 h, these emulsions separated, and the aqueous phase still contained residual oil droplets, indicating potential challenges associated with the disposal or reuse of produced water. Surfactant hydrophobicity, reduction in interfacial tension, and critical micelle concentration were critical properties influencing the observed effects. The surfactant with higher hydrophobicity induced a more significant and rapid reduction in interfacial tension, resulting in faster W/O separation at low concentrations but compromising water quality at high concentrations. These results indicate that careful selection and monitoring of surfactants during EOR operations can optimize oil recovery efficiency while minimizing operational and environmental risks upstream.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c07388
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Residual Zwitterionic Surfactants on Topside Water–Oil Separation of Pre-Salt Light Crude Oil Emulsions

Bruno Giordano Alvarenga, Angela Camila Pinto Duncke, Ana Maria Percebom, Aurora Pérez‐Gramatges
1 citations
ACS Omega
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.15
article

Impact of Residual Zwitterionic Surfactants on Topside Water–Oil Separation of Pre-Salt Light Crude Oil Emulsions

Bruno Giordano Alvarenga, Angela Camila Pinto Duncke, Ana Maria Percebom, Aurora Pérez‐Gramatges
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Zwitterionic surfactants have been used as foaming agents in Enhanced Oil Recovery due to their foamability, tolerance to reservoir conditions, low toxicity, and low adsorption on reservoir rocks. However, in the case of back-production, the impact of zwitterionic surfactants on water-in-crude oil (W/O) emulsions and produced water remains unclear, representing a knowledge gap in the field. The present study evaluated the effect of three commercial zwitterionic surfactants, at concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 ppm, on water-oil separation using a Brazilian Pre-Salt crude oil. Emulsion formation, separation kinetics, and water quality were assessed through bottle tests, droplet size microscopy, and oil-in-water content analysis. At the lowest concentration (50 ppm), these surfactants promoted coalescence and sedimentation of W/O emulsions faster than traditional nonionic and anionic surfactants. Separation kinetics increased as surfactant concentration increased up to 200 ppm, but concentrations above 500 ppm induced the formation of multiple emulsions (W/O/W). After 72 h, these emulsions separated, and the aqueous phase still contained residual oil droplets, indicating potential challenges associated with the disposal or reuse of produced water. Surfactant hydrophobicity, reduction in interfacial tension, and critical micelle concentration were critical properties influencing the observed effects. The surfactant with higher hydrophobicity induced a more significant and rapid reduction in interfacial tension, resulting in faster W/O separation at low concentrations but compromising water quality at high concentrations. These results indicate that careful selection and monitoring of surfactants during EOR operations can optimize oil recovery efficiency while minimizing operational and environmental risks upstream.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(42)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Surfactant Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.