Reimbursement of earnings or income lost by the witness as a result of appearing before a court – commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court of 5 June 2023, I ZSK 44/22

The Art. 618b § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure establishes the upper limit of compensation for lost earnings or income that may be awarded to a witness in connection with his appearance before a criminal court. This maximum amount is much lower than the average daily wage of a person receiving the minimum wage and, as such, in most cases, does not compensate for the actual loss suffered by the witness who appeared before the court. For this reason the above-mentioned provision is considered inconsistent with the Constitution. For now, however, the Constitutional Tribunal has not recognized it as such, so this provision remains in force. Nevertheless, some judges do not apply it, assuming that they have the right to omit provisions that, in their opinion, are inconsistent with the Constitution. By doing so, they expose themselves to disciplinary liability. This gloss (partially critical) concerns the judgment of the Supreme Court – Chamber of Professional Responsibility, pursuant to which the court acquitted a judge who had acted in such a way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/glosa.2025.3.40-46
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimbursement of earnings or income lost by the witness as a result of appearing before a court – commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court of 5 June 2023, I ZSK 44/22

Magdalena Kotulska-Kmiecik
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
Polish Law and Legal System
article

Reimbursement of earnings or income lost by the witness as a result of appearing before a court – commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court of 5 June 2023, I ZSK 44/22

Magdalena Kotulska-Kmiecik
article en

Abstract

The Art. 618b § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure establishes the upper limit of compensation for lost earnings or income that may be awarded to a witness in connection with his appearance before a criminal court. This maximum amount is much lower than the average daily wage of a person receiving the minimum wage and, as such, in most cases, does not compensate for the actual loss suffered by the witness who appeared before the court. For this reason the above-mentioned provision is considered inconsistent with the Constitution. For now, however, the Constitutional Tribunal has not recognized it as such, so this provision remains in force. Nevertheless, some judges do not apply it, assuming that they have the right to omit provisions that, in their opinion, are inconsistent with the Constitution. By doing so, they expose themselves to disciplinary liability. This gloss (partially critical) concerns the judgment of the Supreme Court – Chamber of Professional Responsibility, pursuant to which the court acquitted a judge who had acted in such a way.

Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i KomentarzachVol. 3
Kielce University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.