Socio-Legal Analysis of Letter C in Ulayat Land Transactions Among Indigenous Communities

Ulayat land transactions based on the Letter C document remain prevalent in many parts of Indonesia, despite lacking explicit recognition in the national land law framework. This article aims to analyze the legality of customary land transactions using Letter C, within the perspectives of both customary and national law. Using a socio-legal approach, this research draws upon literature and field data. The findings show that Letter C holds strong social legitimacy at the community level due to its historical, administrative, and symbolic functions. Though weak under national law, courts still consider Letter C as supporting evidence in land disputes. Transactions are considered valid under customary law when they fulfill the principles of konkret, kontan, and terang, and involve approval from customary leaders and village authorities. In conclusion, the state must build a legal bridge that recognizes and accommodates such local practices to reduce agrarian conflict and strengthen legal protection for indigenous communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Unram Law Review
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v9i2.440
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-Legal Analysis of Letter C in Ulayat Land Transactions Among Indigenous Communities

Sukirman Sukirman
Unram Law Review
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

Socio-Legal Analysis of Letter C in Ulayat Land Transactions Among Indigenous Communities

Sukirman Sukirman
article en

Abstract

Ulayat land transactions based on the Letter C document remain prevalent in many parts of Indonesia, despite lacking explicit recognition in the national land law framework. This article aims to analyze the legality of customary land transactions using Letter C, within the perspectives of both customary and national law. Using a socio-legal approach, this research draws upon literature and field data. The findings show that Letter C holds strong social legitimacy at the community level due to its historical, administrative, and symbolic functions. Though weak under national law, courts still consider Letter C as supporting evidence in land disputes. Transactions are considered valid under customary law when they fulfill the principles of konkret, kontan, and terang, and involve approval from customary leaders and village authorities. In conclusion, the state must build a legal bridge that recognizes and accommodates such local practices to reduce agrarian conflict and strengthen legal protection for indigenous communities.

Unram Law ReviewVol. 9(2)
Universitas Gunung Rinjani (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Socio-Legal Analysis of Letter C in Ulayat Land Transactions Among Indigenous Communities — Sukirman Sukirman · Unram Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS