AI Alignment: The Case for Including Animals

Abstract AI alignment efforts and proposals try to make AI systems ethical, safe and beneficial for humans by making them follow human intentions, preferences or values. However, these proposals largely disregard the vast majority of moral patients in existence: non-human animals. AI systems aligned through proposals which largely disregard concern for animal welfare pose significant near-term and long-term animal welfare risks. In this paper, we argue that we should prevent harm to non-human animals, when this does not involve significant costs, and therefore that we have strong moral reasons to at least align AI systems with a basic level of concern for animal welfare. We show how AI alignment with such a concern could be achieved, and why we should expect it to significantly reduce the harm non-human animals would otherwise endure as a result of continued AI development. We provide some recommended policies that AI companies and governmental bodies should consider implementing to ensure basic animal welfare protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00979-1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Alignment: The Case for Including Animals

Yip Fai Tse, Soenke Ziesche, Peter Singer, Adrià Moret
3 citations
Philosophy & Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

AI Alignment: The Case for Including Animals

Yip Fai Tse, Soenke Ziesche, Peter Singer, Adrià Moret
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract AI alignment efforts and proposals try to make AI systems ethical, safe and beneficial for humans by making them follow human intentions, preferences or values. However, these proposals largely disregard the vast majority of moral patients in existence: non-human animals. AI systems aligned through proposals which largely disregard concern for animal welfare pose significant near-term and long-term animal welfare risks. In this paper, we argue that we should prevent harm to non-human animals, when this does not involve significant costs, and therefore that we have strong moral reasons to at least align AI systems with a basic level of concern for animal welfare. We show how AI alignment with such a concern could be achieved, and why we should expect it to significantly reduce the harm non-human animals would otherwise endure as a result of continued AI development. We provide some recommended policies that AI companies and governmental bodies should consider implementing to ensure basic animal welfare protection.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(4)
National University of Singapore (SG), Princeton University (US), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Princeton University, University Center for Human Values, Princeton University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI Alignment: The Case for Including Animals — Yip Fai Tse, Soenke Ziesche, et al. · Philosophy & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS