Third party liability for tax arrears of a limited liability company – critical commentary on the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 11 September 2024, III FSK 1038/23

The paper analyses the liability of a member of the management board (third party) of a limited liability company for the obligations of that company, in the event of failure to file a bankruptcy petition in due time, in a situation where the company had only one creditor (the State Treasury). The author critically refers to the ruling that fits into the line of case law, according to which even in a situation where there is only one creditor, there are grounds for filing a bankruptcy petition. The gloss indicates that this statement is contrary to the essence of bankruptcy law, which is the so-called group enforcement proceedings, intended to ensure equal opportunities in satisfying receivables. In the absence of the requirement of a plurality of creditors, it is inappropriate to burden the company with the obligation to file a bankruptcy petition, and thus to impose subsidiary liability for the company’s obligations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/glosa.2025.3.102-110
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Third party liability for tax arrears of a limited liability company – critical commentary on the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 11 September 2024, III FSK 1038/23

Paweł Lewandowski
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Third party liability for tax arrears of a limited liability company – critical commentary on the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 11 September 2024, III FSK 1038/23

Paweł Lewandowski
article en

Abstract

The paper analyses the liability of a member of the management board (third party) of a limited liability company for the obligations of that company, in the event of failure to file a bankruptcy petition in due time, in a situation where the company had only one creditor (the State Treasury). The author critically refers to the ruling that fits into the line of case law, according to which even in a situation where there is only one creditor, there are grounds for filing a bankruptcy petition. The gloss indicates that this statement is contrary to the essence of bankruptcy law, which is the so-called group enforcement proceedings, intended to ensure equal opportunities in satisfying receivables. In the absence of the requirement of a plurality of creditors, it is inappropriate to burden the company with the obligation to file a bankruptcy petition, and thus to impose subsidiary liability for the company’s obligations.

Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i KomentarzachVol. 3
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Olsztynie (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Third party liability for tax arrears of a limited liability company – critical commentary on the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 11 September 2024, III FSK 1038/23 — Paweł Lewandowski · Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS