A SARS-CoV-2 variant‑adjusted threshold of protection model for monoclonal antibody pre-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19

Clinical development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is challenging due to rapid changes in the variant landscape. This study identified a threshold model for neutralising antibody (nAb) titres associated with clinically relevant protection against symptomatic COVID-19 for vulnerable populations. Using efficacy data from the phase 3 PROVENT pre-exposure prophylaxis trial of tixagevimab-cilgavimab (NCT04625725), individual nAb ID<sub>50</sub> titres were predicted by dividing serum mAb concentration by prevalence-adjusted tixagevimab-cilgavimab potency (from in vitro IC<sub>50</sub> values combined with viral surveillance data) and related to efficacy with a Cox model. The Threshold of Protection (ToP) Cox model was externally validated using data from the phase 3 SUPERNOVA trial (NCT05648110), which assessed sipavibart efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 in immunocompromised participants. The PROVENT ToP model estimated the variant-specific observed efficacies from SUPERNOVA for 3 and 6 months post any dose with Lin's concordance of 0.86 and 0.75, respectively. This approach integrates predicted nAb ID<sub>50</sub> titres against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants into a ToP model that can be applied across different variants and could serve as a surrogate endpoint in immunobridging studies to expedite clinical evaluation and regulatory approval for mAbs targeting SARS-CoV-2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63972-4
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A SARS-CoV-2 variant‑adjusted threshold of protection model for monoclonal antibody pre-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19

Ian Hirsch, Lindsay E. Clegg, Rhiannon Edge, John L. Perez et al.
Nature Communications
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

A SARS-CoV-2 variant‑adjusted threshold of protection model for monoclonal antibody pre-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19

Ian Hirsch, Lindsay E. Clegg, Rhiannon Edge, John L. Perez, Anastasia A. Aksyuk, Taylor S. Cohen, Bahar Ahani, Sam Matthews, Tom White, Seth Seegobin, Oleg Stepanov, Lee-Jah Chang, Dean A. Follmann, John Pura, Mark T. Esser, Katie L. Streicher, Peter B. Gilbert, Tonya Villafana
article en

Abstract

Clinical development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is challenging due to rapid changes in the variant landscape. This study identified a threshold model for neutralising antibody (nAb) titres associated with clinically relevant protection against symptomatic COVID-19 for vulnerable populations. Using efficacy data from the phase 3 PROVENT pre-exposure prophylaxis trial of tixagevimab-cilgavimab (NCT04625725), individual nAb ID<sub>50</sub> titres were predicted by dividing serum mAb concentration by prevalence-adjusted tixagevimab-cilgavimab potency (from in vitro IC<sub>50</sub> values combined with viral surveillance data) and related to efficacy with a Cox model. The Threshold of Protection (ToP) Cox model was externally validated using data from the phase 3 SUPERNOVA trial (NCT05648110), which assessed sipavibart efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 in immunocompromised participants. The PROVENT ToP model estimated the variant-specific observed efficacies from SUPERNOVA for 3 and 6 months post any dose with Lin's concordance of 0.86 and 0.75, respectively. This approach integrates predicted nAb ID<sub>50</sub> titres against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants into a ToP model that can be applied across different variants and could serve as a surrogate endpoint in immunobridging studies to expedite clinical evaluation and regulatory approval for mAbs targeting SARS-CoV-2.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), National Institutes of Health (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), AstraZeneca (South Korea) (KR), AstraZeneca (Australia) (AU), AstraZeneca (Switzerland) (CH), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), AstraZeneca (Poland) (PL), AstraZeneca (Finland) (FI), AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
AstraZeneca
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.