Persistencia de los Mitos entre el Profesorado sobre el Alumnado de Altas Capacidades: Una Revisión Sistemática

Myths, as erroneous, fallacious or unfounded belief, representation and knowledge (CRS) systems, rooted in teachers regarding students with High Abilities (HAS), mobilize their processes of detection, identification and attention to their educational needs. The objectives of this systematic review were to analyze the myths that persist as responses that primary and secondary education teachers offer to students with HAS and to review the type of actions they generate in the face of this diversity. In this review, the PRISMA declaration is followed, registering the protocol in the Open Science Framework (OSF) Platform. From five databases, 24 studies were selected that met the inclusion criteria. The studies show that the most common myths are related to high academic performance, elitist consideration that implies attention to HAS students or the guarantee of success without specialized educational support. The most successful educational practices are acceleration, enrichment, groupings and specific programs. Teacher training in caring for students with ADHD is necessary to help overcome the obstacles that these students encounter in the different educational contexts in which they seek to develop their talent potential

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
REICE Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en Educación
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2025.23.4.006
Primary Topic
Geography and Education Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persistencia de los Mitos entre el Profesorado sobre el Alumnado de Altas Capacidades: Una Revisión Sistemática

Inmaculada Chiva Sanchís, Ana María Moral Mora, Genoveva Ramos Santana
REICE Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en Educación
Geography and Education Methods
article

Persistencia de los Mitos entre el Profesorado sobre el Alumnado de Altas Capacidades: Una Revisión Sistemática

Inmaculada Chiva Sanchís, Ana María Moral Mora, Genoveva Ramos Santana
article en

Abstract

Myths, as erroneous, fallacious or unfounded belief, representation and knowledge (CRS) systems, rooted in teachers regarding students with High Abilities (HAS), mobilize their processes of detection, identification and attention to their educational needs. The objectives of this systematic review were to analyze the myths that persist as responses that primary and secondary education teachers offer to students with HAS and to review the type of actions they generate in the face of this diversity. In this review, the PRISMA declaration is followed, registering the protocol in the Open Science Framework (OSF) Platform. From five databases, 24 studies were selected that met the inclusion criteria. The studies show that the most common myths are related to high academic performance, elitist consideration that implies attention to HAS students or the guarantee of success without specialized educational support. The most successful educational practices are acceleration, enrichment, groupings and specific programs. Teacher training in caring for students with ADHD is necessary to help overcome the obstacles that these students encounter in the different educational contexts in which they seek to develop their talent potential

REICE Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en EducaciónVol. 23(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Geography and Education Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.