Perceptions, Power, and Polarization: U.S. Strategic Views on Pakistan’s Emerging Alliance with China

The research was carried out in investigating how the U.S. strategic decision makers perceived the deepening relationship between Pakistan and China. Qualitative content analysis was used in conjunction with policy documents, congressional testimony, think-tank stuff and open source security collection data. The central investigation was whether the assessment on Pakistan on the global scale has changed to focus on technologically advanced instruments. Its results revealed a strongly re-oriented U.S. attitude: Pakistan was being seen more and more as a key component of Chinese regional strategy. They linked this evolution, in part, to Pakistan developing cyber and network-centric capability, which was altering the U.S. calculus of military imbalance and risk of escalation especially relative to India. The reliance of the United States on India as the offshore balancing option to China, therefore, became very complicated, creating a question on whether to embrace or hedge the role of Pakistan. The study offers a contribution to the international relations theory because it was able to show how great powers form their strategy based on their perception of middle states. It also provides information on the way these changes can affect the state of regional stability and crisis management in South Asia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63056/acad.004.04.0935
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions, Power, and Polarization: U.S. Strategic Views on Pakistan’s Emerging Alliance with China

Muhammad Shakeel Ahmad Siddiqui, Prof. Dr. Syed Shahid Hussain Bukhari
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Perceptions, Power, and Polarization: U.S. Strategic Views on Pakistan’s Emerging Alliance with China

Muhammad Shakeel Ahmad Siddiqui, Prof. Dr. Syed Shahid Hussain Bukhari
article en

Abstract

The research was carried out in investigating how the U.S. strategic decision makers perceived the deepening relationship between Pakistan and China. Qualitative content analysis was used in conjunction with policy documents, congressional testimony, think-tank stuff and open source security collection data. The central investigation was whether the assessment on Pakistan on the global scale has changed to focus on technologically advanced instruments. Its results revealed a strongly re-oriented U.S. attitude: Pakistan was being seen more and more as a key component of Chinese regional strategy. They linked this evolution, in part, to Pakistan developing cyber and network-centric capability, which was altering the U.S. calculus of military imbalance and risk of escalation especially relative to India. The reliance of the United States on India as the offshore balancing option to China, therefore, became very complicated, creating a question on whether to embrace or hedge the role of Pakistan. The study offers a contribution to the international relations theory because it was able to show how great powers form their strategy based on their perception of middle states. It also provides information on the way these changes can affect the state of regional stability and crisis management in South Asia.

ACADEMIA International Journal for Social SciencesVol. 4(4)
Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK), Government College of Science (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.