On not to jumping to conclusions: working in a Many Minds group as part of doctoral training

This article explores the role of a Many Minds data-analysis group within the broader context of doctoral research culture, highlighting its significance as a supportive space for researchers in training. Over a six-month period, a conversation between two contributors, a PhD supervisor and the supervisee, captures the enriching impact of this collaborative dialogue on a PhD project investigating the experience of transitions of young people leaving residential care in Chile. Maintained in a conversational format, it follows the dialogic inquiry of the two authors about the experience of participating in the group. Through their exchange, the authors address key questions regarding data engagement, meaning-making and the structuring of supportive research environments, concluding that the capacity to think emerges as a relational achievement within the context of doctoral supervision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Studies
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/14786737y2025d000000054
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On not to jumping to conclusions: working in a Many Minds group as part of doctoral training

Rachel Thomson, Felipe Paredes-Ramos
1 citations
Journal of Psychosocial Studies
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
4.17
article

On not to jumping to conclusions: working in a Many Minds group as part of doctoral training

Rachel Thomson, Felipe Paredes-Ramos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the role of a Many Minds data-analysis group within the broader context of doctoral research culture, highlighting its significance as a supportive space for researchers in training. Over a six-month period, a conversation between two contributors, a PhD supervisor and the supervisee, captures the enriching impact of this collaborative dialogue on a PhD project investigating the experience of transitions of young people leaving residential care in Chile. Maintained in a conversational format, it follows the dialogic inquiry of the two authors about the experience of participating in the group. Through their exchange, the authors address key questions regarding data engagement, meaning-making and the structuring of supportive research environments, concluding that the capacity to think emerges as a relational achievement within the context of doctoral supervision.

Journal of Psychosocial StudiesVol. 18(2)
University of Sussex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.