Creating Procedural Diagrams in Mixed Methods Research Beyond Boxes and Arrows

This methodological paper discusses foci for researchers to use when creating procedural diagrams to illustrate different design elements. This paper draws upon the nascent literature describing how researchers create such diagrams and examines a sample of them from the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from its inception until 2024. The procedural diagrams were analyzed using a two-cycle coding procedure, beginning with the constant comparative technique and concluding with deductive coding, utilizing the dimensions of Creamer’s Mixed Methods Evaluation Rubric. Four foci were found: integration, coverage, iteration, and logistics. This paper contributes to the literature by showcasing how procedural diagrams can be designed with these four foci and grounded in considerations of mixed methods quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251387869
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating Procedural Diagrams in Mixed Methods Research Beyond Boxes and Arrows

David Reeping
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Creating Procedural Diagrams in Mixed Methods Research Beyond Boxes and Arrows

David Reeping
article en

Abstract

This methodological paper discusses foci for researchers to use when creating procedural diagrams to illustrate different design elements. This paper draws upon the nascent literature describing how researchers create such diagrams and examines a sample of them from the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from its inception until 2024. The procedural diagrams were analyzed using a two-cycle coding procedure, beginning with the constant comparative technique and concluding with deductive coding, utilizing the dimensions of Creamer’s Mixed Methods Evaluation Rubric. Four foci were found: integration, coverage, iteration, and logistics. This paper contributes to the literature by showcasing how procedural diagrams can be designed with these four foci and grounded in considerations of mixed methods quality.

Journal of Mixed Methods Research
University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creating Procedural Diagrams in Mixed Methods Research Beyond Boxes and Arrows — David Reeping · Journal of Mixed Methods Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS