Spatial-economic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural residue burning in Thailand’s rice, maize, and sugarcane cultivation areas

Abstract This study investigates the environmental and economic impacts of agricultural residue burning in Thailand, focusing on rice, maize, and sugarcane, which collectively occupy 96.8 million Rai annually and generate 114 million tons of residues. Open burning is a cost-effective but environmentally detrimental practice that contributes significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This research aims to quantify the burned areas, estimate GHG emissions, and assess the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) using Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques and MODIS satellite imagery combined with bottom-up approach emissions calculations. In addition, the cost of Carbon emissions was estimated using the average carbon credit price in Asia as a representative benchmark. The findings reveal annual GHG emissions of approximately 800,000 tCO ₂ e, primarily from rice (362,231 tons), maize (160,875 tons), and sugarcane (277,314 tons). The SCC is estimated at 146 million Baht, disproportionately affecting the Northern and Central Regions, which exhibit the highest prevalence of burning for rice sugarcane and maize, respectively. This spatial analysis highlights key hot-spots and provides critical insights to inform targeted policy interventions. Its findings emphasize the need for regionally tailored policies to mitigate the environmental and economic costs of open burning. Sustainable alternatives, such as composting are recommended, supported by targeted education, financial incentives, and policy measures. These strategies could substantially reduce emissions, improve air quality, and align Thailand’s agricultural sector with its climate and sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Environment Research
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-025-00261-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial-economic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural residue burning in Thailand’s rice, maize, and sugarcane cultivation areas

Onicha Meangbua, Yingluck Kanchanaroek, Totsanat Rattanakaew, Pidok Kako et al.
1 citations
Sustainable Environment Research
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
article

Spatial-economic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural residue burning in Thailand’s rice, maize, and sugarcane cultivation areas

Onicha Meangbua, Yingluck Kanchanaroek, Totsanat Rattanakaew, Pidok Kako, Warayut Doungjun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the environmental and economic impacts of agricultural residue burning in Thailand, focusing on rice, maize, and sugarcane, which collectively occupy 96.8 million Rai annually and generate 114 million tons of residues. Open burning is a cost-effective but environmentally detrimental practice that contributes significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This research aims to quantify the burned areas, estimate GHG emissions, and assess the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) using Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques and MODIS satellite imagery combined with bottom-up approach emissions calculations. In addition, the cost of Carbon emissions was estimated using the average carbon credit price in Asia as a representative benchmark. The findings reveal annual GHG emissions of approximately 800,000 tCO ₂ e, primarily from rice (362,231 tons), maize (160,875 tons), and sugarcane (277,314 tons). The SCC is estimated at 146 million Baht, disproportionately affecting the Northern and Central Regions, which exhibit the highest prevalence of burning for rice sugarcane and maize, respectively. This spatial analysis highlights key hot-spots and provides critical insights to inform targeted policy interventions. Its findings emphasize the need for regionally tailored policies to mitigate the environmental and economic costs of open burning. Sustainable alternatives, such as composting are recommended, supported by targeted education, financial incentives, and policy measures. These strategies could substantially reduce emissions, improve air quality, and align Thailand’s agricultural sector with its climate and sustainability goals.

Sustainable Environment ResearchVol. 35(1)
Thammasat University (TH), Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (TH), Mahidol University (TH)
Thailand Research Fund, Thammasat University
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.