Dynamical law behind eye movements: Distinguishing between Lévy and intermittent strategies

Foraging is a complex spatiotemporal process that is often described with stochastic models. Two particular ones, Lévy walks and intermittent search, became popular in this context. Researchers from the two communities, each advocating for either Lévy or intermittent approach, independently analyzed foraging patterns and reported agreement between empirical data and the model they used. We resolve this Lévy-intermittent dichotomy for eye-gaze trajectories collected in a series of experiments designed to stimulate free foraging for visual information. By combining analytical results, statistical quantifiers, and basic machine learning techniques, we devise a method to score the performance of the models when they are used to approximate an individual gaze trajectory. Our analysis indicates that the intermittent search model consistently yields higher scores and thus approximates the majority of the eye-gaze trajectories better.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Research
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/2bzm-t9k1
Primary Topic
Diffusion and Search Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamical law behind eye movements: Distinguishing between Lévy and intermittent strategies

Yurii Serhiiovych Bystryk, Pedro G. Lind, Anis Yazidi, Pedro Lencastre et al.
Physical Review Research
Diffusion and Search Dynamics
article

Dynamical law behind eye movements: Distinguishing between Lévy and intermittent strategies

Yurii Serhiiovych Bystryk, Pedro G. Lind, Anis Yazidi, Pedro Lencastre, S. Denisov
article en

Abstract

Foraging is a complex spatiotemporal process that is often described with stochastic models. Two particular ones, Lévy walks and intermittent search, became popular in this context. Researchers from the two communities, each advocating for either Lévy or intermittent approach, independently analyzed foraging patterns and reported agreement between empirical data and the model they used. We resolve this Lévy-intermittent dichotomy for eye-gaze trajectories collected in a series of experiments designed to stimulate free foraging for visual information. By combining analytical results, statistical quantifiers, and basic machine learning techniques, we devise a method to score the performance of the models when they are used to approximate an individual gaze trajectory. Our analysis indicates that the intermittent search model consistently yields higher scores and thus approximates the majority of the eye-gaze trajectories better.

Physical Review ResearchVol. 7(4)
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Simula Research Laboratory (NO), Høyskolen Kristiania (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Diffusion and Search Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.