Random Forest Regressor Models for Volatility Prediction: Empirical Performance in Delta-Neutral Hedging Strategies

This study investigate the efficacy of Random Forest Regressor (RFR) models as volatility prediction model applied in delta-neutral hedging strategies compared to traditional Historical Volatility (HV) and Implied Volatility (IV) approaches. 76 RFR volatility prediction models are trained on diverse historical windows using 10 rigorously selected features from 20 designed candidates, and systematic hyperparameter optimization. These models are empirically tested in delta-neutral hedging context 34 European call options from 2022-2024. The results implicate that RFR models achieve superior performance compared to traditional benchmarks, with significant improvement in RMSE while maintaining competitive MAE performance. Furthermore, a non-negligible amount of reduction in transaction costs and high win rates against traditional model proved RFR volatility prediction models cost-effective hedging performance. These findings provide compelling evidence that RFR volatility prediction model can outperform traditional models with better volatility prediction and efficient rebalancing across different market conditions. The demonstrated adaptability and efficiency of the RFR framework position it as a robust and practical tool for enhancing delta-hedging strategies in quantitative finance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.bj27792
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Random Forest Regressor Models for Volatility Prediction: Empirical Performance in Delta-Neutral Hedging Strategies

Zhanwang Zheng
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Random Forest Regressor Models for Volatility Prediction: Empirical Performance in Delta-Neutral Hedging Strategies

Zhanwang Zheng
article en

Abstract

This study investigate the efficacy of Random Forest Regressor (RFR) models as volatility prediction model applied in delta-neutral hedging strategies compared to traditional Historical Volatility (HV) and Implied Volatility (IV) approaches. 76 RFR volatility prediction models are trained on diverse historical windows using 10 rigorously selected features from 20 designed candidates, and systematic hyperparameter optimization. These models are empirically tested in delta-neutral hedging context 34 European call options from 2022-2024. The results implicate that RFR models achieve superior performance compared to traditional benchmarks, with significant improvement in RMSE while maintaining competitive MAE performance. Furthermore, a non-negligible amount of reduction in transaction costs and high win rates against traditional model proved RFR volatility prediction models cost-effective hedging performance. These findings provide compelling evidence that RFR volatility prediction model can outperform traditional models with better volatility prediction and efficient rebalancing across different market conditions. The demonstrated adaptability and efficiency of the RFR framework position it as a robust and practical tool for enhancing delta-hedging strategies in quantitative finance.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 221(1)
King University (US), Peking University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.