Pricing BTC and ETH Options with the Rough Bergomi Model

The high volatility of the cryptocurrency options market makes traditional options pricing models unsuitable for its market environment. Although existing studies have shown that basic models are effective, they are based on smooth volatility and have not been fully validated for their applicability to cryptocurrency option markets. This study compares the performance of the rough Bergomi, Kou, and Bates models in the pricing of European-style options on BTC and ETH futures, thereby validating the superiority of the rough volatility model. The results indicate that the rough Bergomi model not only has lower pricing errors but also estimates a Hurst parameter H < 0.5, confirming the roughness of cryptocurrency volatility. Qualitative analysis further indicates that the rough Bergomi model is more accurate in replicating the market-implied volatility smile curve and the skewed power-law timing of the skew toward the positive price range, establishing the model as a superior framework for pricing cryptocurrency derivatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.bj27619
Primary Topic
Stochastic processes and financial applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pricing BTC and ETH Options with the Rough Bergomi Model

Muxin Ge
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Stochastic processes and financial applications
article

Pricing BTC and ETH Options with the Rough Bergomi Model

Muxin Ge
article en

Abstract

The high volatility of the cryptocurrency options market makes traditional options pricing models unsuitable for its market environment. Although existing studies have shown that basic models are effective, they are based on smooth volatility and have not been fully validated for their applicability to cryptocurrency option markets. This study compares the performance of the rough Bergomi, Kou, and Bates models in the pricing of European-style options on BTC and ETH futures, thereby validating the superiority of the rough volatility model. The results indicate that the rough Bergomi model not only has lower pricing errors but also estimates a Hurst parameter H < 0.5, confirming the roughness of cryptocurrency volatility. Qualitative analysis further indicates that the rough Bergomi model is more accurate in replicating the market-implied volatility smile curve and the skewed power-law timing of the skew toward the positive price range, establishing the model as a superior framework for pricing cryptocurrency derivatives.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 221(1)
Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Stochastic processes and financial applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pricing BTC and ETH Options with the Rough Bergomi Model — Muxin Ge · Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS