Triple perspective: assessing deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established treatment for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), often leading to positive motor and non-motor outcomes. While objective motor improvements after DBS are well documented, less is known about how patients and all those involved in their care perceive these benefits on a subjective level. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the perception gap between patients, caregivers, and treating neurologists regarding DBS physical and psychological benefits in PD and their correlates. 25 PD patients (age 58.9 ± 8.0 years; 9 women) who underwent bilateral STN-DBS, along with their caregivers and neurologists, rated perceived psychological and physical improvements 6 months after surgery using a two-item Visual Analogue Scales (VAS, 0–10). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [95% confidence interval]) were calculated to assess reliability between raters. Patients, caregivers, and neurologists reported an average improvement of about 60% in the psychological domain and over 75% in the physical domain (p < 0.001). No significant differences emerged between groups in two domains (p > 0.05). Inter-rater agreement was moderate-to-good for psychological improvement (0.74 [0.41–0.90], p < 0.001), moderate for physical improvement (0.69 [0.27–0.88], p = 0.003), and good overall (0.79 [0.50–0.92], p < 0.001). PD patients, caregivers, and neurologists largely agree on the benefits of DBS six months post-surgery, reinforcing the reliability of patient self-report in outcome assessment. Integrating patient self-reports with proxy assessments enhances the evaluation of DBS outcomes, supporting a more comprehensive and patient-centered approach to both treatment assessment and post-surgical care. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06329726. Registered on 26 March 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Neurology
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04455-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triple perspective: assessing deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson's disease

Francesca Mameli, Enrico Mailland, Roberta Ferrucci, Angelica De Sandi et al.
1 citations
BMC Neurology
Neurological disorders and treatments
1.39
article

Triple perspective: assessing deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson's disease

Francesca Mameli, Enrico Mailland, Roberta Ferrucci, Angelica De Sandi, Elena Pirola, Luigi Gianmaria Remore, Angelica Marfoli, Marco Locatelli, Filippo Cogiamanian, Antonella Ampollini, Denise Mellace, Alberto Priori, Fabiana Ruggiero, Linda Borellini, Eleonora Zirone, Sergio Barbieri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established treatment for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), often leading to positive motor and non-motor outcomes. While objective motor improvements after DBS are well documented, less is known about how patients and all those involved in their care perceive these benefits on a subjective level. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the perception gap between patients, caregivers, and treating neurologists regarding DBS physical and psychological benefits in PD and their correlates. 25 PD patients (age 58.9 ± 8.0 years; 9 women) who underwent bilateral STN-DBS, along with their caregivers and neurologists, rated perceived psychological and physical improvements 6 months after surgery using a two-item Visual Analogue Scales (VAS, 0–10). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [95% confidence interval]) were calculated to assess reliability between raters. Patients, caregivers, and neurologists reported an average improvement of about 60% in the psychological domain and over 75% in the physical domain (p < 0.001). No significant differences emerged between groups in two domains (p > 0.05). Inter-rater agreement was moderate-to-good for psychological improvement (0.74 [0.41–0.90], p < 0.001), moderate for physical improvement (0.69 [0.27–0.88], p = 0.003), and good overall (0.79 [0.50–0.92], p < 0.001). PD patients, caregivers, and neurologists largely agree on the benefits of DBS six months post-surgery, reinforcing the reliability of patient self-report in outcome assessment. Integrating patient self-reports with proxy assessments enhances the evaluation of DBS outcomes, supporting a more comprehensive and patient-centered approach to both treatment assessment and post-surgical care. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06329726. Registered on 26 March 2024.

BMC NeurologyVol. 25(1)
AOL (United States) (US), University of Milan (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Ospedale Maggiore (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano, Ministero della Salute, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Center for Neurotechnology, University of Washington
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neurological disorders and treatments
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.