Resolving Investor Protection in Climate-Related Disputes: Some Legal Reflections

The global implementation of climate measures has generated complex legal challenges at the intersection of climate change mitigation and international investment law. While governments increasingly adopt regulatory measures to address their climate concerns, these policies have caused a rise in investor-state disputes. This article examines the legal challenges emerging from investor-state arbitration mechanism when states implement climate-related regulatory policies. It investigates the tension between state sovereignty in climate policy and international investment protection obligations. The analysis identifies systemic obstacles in the current arbitration practice and proposes approaches to reconcile the competing imperatives of climate action and investor protection. By analysing the legal implications of climate change regulatory measures, this article advances the scholarly discourse on climate governance and international investment law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Policy and Law
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18785395251385826
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving Investor Protection in Climate-Related Disputes: Some Legal Reflections

Xiaobo Zhao, Lingling He
Environmental Policy and Law
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Resolving Investor Protection in Climate-Related Disputes: Some Legal Reflections

Xiaobo Zhao, Lingling He
article en

Abstract

The global implementation of climate measures has generated complex legal challenges at the intersection of climate change mitigation and international investment law. While governments increasingly adopt regulatory measures to address their climate concerns, these policies have caused a rise in investor-state disputes. This article examines the legal challenges emerging from investor-state arbitration mechanism when states implement climate-related regulatory policies. It investigates the tension between state sovereignty in climate policy and international investment protection obligations. The analysis identifies systemic obstacles in the current arbitration practice and proposes approaches to reconcile the competing imperatives of climate action and investor protection. By analysing the legal implications of climate change regulatory measures, this article advances the scholarly discourse on climate governance and international investment law.

Environmental Policy and LawVol. 55(6)
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.