Gardens as multispecies public spaces in Georgian modernity

The Kutaisi “Boulevard” (1848) was the first public “park” in Georgia, and quickly became the social and intellectual center of this small, peripheral Georgian city. Although a physically small, and perhaps from an outsider perspective, unremarkable plot of greenspace, as a greenspace, it became a public place central to the imagining of associated literary publics, and finally, as an infrastructure embodying an aspirational claim to modernity, its by turns dusty or muddy garden paths could also be found fault with as being materially a relatively abject incarnation of modernity, something which was felt to always be better incarnated somewhere else. In these critiques of the garden as infrastructure for “liberal walking”, the dusty or muddy paths of the garden were of more interest than the plants. Although all gardens are centres of what Hartigan calls “plant publics”, for these critics, the multispecies publics of the garden (humans and nonhumans) came to be an additional sign of the abjection of infrastructures embodying a failed modernity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251371535
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gardens as multispecies public spaces in Georgian modernity

Paul Manning
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Gardens as multispecies public spaces in Georgian modernity

Paul Manning
article en

Abstract

The Kutaisi “Boulevard” (1848) was the first public “park” in Georgia, and quickly became the social and intellectual center of this small, peripheral Georgian city. Although a physically small, and perhaps from an outsider perspective, unremarkable plot of greenspace, as a greenspace, it became a public place central to the imagining of associated literary publics, and finally, as an infrastructure embodying an aspirational claim to modernity, its by turns dusty or muddy garden paths could also be found fault with as being materially a relatively abject incarnation of modernity, something which was felt to always be better incarnated somewhere else. In these critiques of the garden as infrastructure for “liberal walking”, the dusty or muddy paths of the garden were of more interest than the plants. Although all gardens are centres of what Hartigan calls “plant publics”, for these critics, the multispecies publics of the garden (humans and nonhumans) came to be an additional sign of the abjection of infrastructures embodying a failed modernity.

Environment and Planning E Nature and SpaceVol. 9(1)
Trent University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.