Towards a critical understanding of digital twins: The politics of digitalizing rivers in China

Digital twin technologies play an increasingly important role in addressing predictive management and real-time decision-making for environmental challenges, with the potential to significantly transform river governance. By examining Digital Twin Yangtze, this paper critically analyzes how the Chinese state strategically positions digital twin technologies for governing rivers and for reinforcing authority over water, people, and territory. Inquiring into how rivers become “smart” through the integration of digital technologies in river management, we critically examine the politics of digital twins and the digitalization of rivers from a political ecology perspective. Within a theoretical Riverhood framework, we conceptualize river as ecosociety, as territory, as subject, and as movement, to unravel the ongoing technical, political, and cultural-symbolic transformation of river territories, imaginaries, and practices through governmentalization and techno-digital river subject-making. We argue that digital twin river basins embody a limited state-imagined “river reality” which, when transformed into digitized hydrosocial territories, can have potentially far-reaching implications for river governance. We find that digital twins rest on a reductionist logic that not only produces techno-digital subjects but also reinforces a technocratic imaginary and approach that simplifies rivers through numerification and datafication. Through our investigation, we seek to scrutinize the politics of river digitization and advocate for a nuanced, interdisciplinary, inclusive, and re-politicized perspective in water governance over the blind pursuit of computational sophistication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251386256
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a critical understanding of digital twins: The politics of digitalizing rivers in China

Rutgerd Boelens, Lieke Anna Melsen, Sarah Rogers, Xiao Han et al.
1 citations
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Water Governance and Infrastructure
8.52
article

Towards a critical understanding of digital twins: The politics of digitalizing rivers in China

Rutgerd Boelens, Lieke Anna Melsen, Sarah Rogers, Xiao Han, Gert Jan Veldwisch, Q. Zhang L. Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital twin technologies play an increasingly important role in addressing predictive management and real-time decision-making for environmental challenges, with the potential to significantly transform river governance. By examining Digital Twin Yangtze, this paper critically analyzes how the Chinese state strategically positions digital twin technologies for governing rivers and for reinforcing authority over water, people, and territory. Inquiring into how rivers become “smart” through the integration of digital technologies in river management, we critically examine the politics of digital twins and the digitalization of rivers from a political ecology perspective. Within a theoretical Riverhood framework, we conceptualize river as ecosociety, as territory, as subject, and as movement, to unravel the ongoing technical, political, and cultural-symbolic transformation of river territories, imaginaries, and practices through governmentalization and techno-digital river subject-making. We argue that digital twin river basins embody a limited state-imagined “river reality” which, when transformed into digitized hydrosocial territories, can have potentially far-reaching implications for river governance. We find that digital twins rest on a reductionist logic that not only produces techno-digital subjects but also reinforces a technocratic imaginary and approach that simplifies rivers through numerification and datafication. Through our investigation, we seek to scrutinize the politics of river digitization and advocate for a nuanced, interdisciplinary, inclusive, and re-politicized perspective in water governance over the blind pursuit of computational sophistication.

Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.