Can an inertial measurement unit be used as a field tool for acrobatic gymnasts training?

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a promising tool for assessing and monitoring performance in acrobatic gymnastics, potentially providing coaches with valuable biomechanical insights. IMU and motion capture data were collected synchronously in laboratory conditions while acrobatic gymnasts performed two acrobatic skills: a back tucked somersault (BTS) and a back straight somersault (BSS). Resultant linear acceleration and angular velocity (mediolateral axis) were calculated using data from an optical motion capture system (MOCAP) and using an IMU placed in the sacrum of 19 national and international level acrobatic gymnasts, divided into 11 pairs. The entire signals were compared using statistical parametric mapping. Results showed that the IMU systematically underestimated both acceleration and angular velocity when compared to the reference system. For the base gymnast's acceleration, four (BTS) and six (BSS) clusters showed significant differences. For the top gymnast, both tasks differed approximately 100% of the time (p < .001). Regarding angular velocity, eight (BTS) and three (BSS) clusters showed significant differences, reinforcing the underestimation observed. Our findings suggest that IMU data is not sensitive to the kinematic phases (speeds, accelerations, decelerations) occurring during the top gymnast flight. These findings suggest that a single IMU may not provide reliable or sufficient information for performance assessment in acrobatic gymnastics training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251384251
Primary Topic
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can an inertial measurement unit be used as a field tool for acrobatic gymnasts training?

Filipe Conceiç�ão, Márcio Fagundes Goethel, João Paulo Vilas‐Boas, Luis Arturo Gómez-Landero et al.
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
article

Can an inertial measurement unit be used as a field tool for acrobatic gymnasts training?

Filipe Conceiç�ão, Márcio Fagundes Goethel, João Paulo Vilas‐Boas, Luis Arturo Gómez-Landero, Luís Mochizuki, Isaura Leite, Lurdes Ávila-Carvalho
article en

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a promising tool for assessing and monitoring performance in acrobatic gymnastics, potentially providing coaches with valuable biomechanical insights. IMU and motion capture data were collected synchronously in laboratory conditions while acrobatic gymnasts performed two acrobatic skills: a back tucked somersault (BTS) and a back straight somersault (BSS). Resultant linear acceleration and angular velocity (mediolateral axis) were calculated using data from an optical motion capture system (MOCAP) and using an IMU placed in the sacrum of 19 national and international level acrobatic gymnasts, divided into 11 pairs. The entire signals were compared using statistical parametric mapping. Results showed that the IMU systematically underestimated both acceleration and angular velocity when compared to the reference system. For the base gymnast's acceleration, four (BTS) and six (BSS) clusters showed significant differences. For the top gymnast, both tasks differed approximately 100% of the time (p < .001). Regarding angular velocity, eight (BTS) and three (BSS) clusters showed significant differences, reinforcing the underestimation observed. Our findings suggest that IMU data is not sensitive to the kinematic phases (speeds, accelerations, decelerations) occurring during the top gymnast flight. These findings suggest that a single IMU may not provide reliable or sufficient information for performance assessment in acrobatic gymnastics training.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.