Regulating Self-Preferencing in China: Towards a Lenient Approach

This article examines the regulatory approach to self-preferencing by digital platforms in China, arguing for a lenient rather than stringent framework. Through comparative analysis of international casessuch as the EU s structural interventions and the behavioral remedies adopted in South Korea and the United Statesthe study highlights the risks of strict regulation in stifling innovation, disrupting ecosystem synergies, and undermining data-driven efficiency gains. It further explores how consumer heterogeneity, particularly between loyal and switching consumers, naturally constrains abusive self-preferencing. The article concludes that China should embrace conduct-based regulatory tools such as algorithmic transparency and cross-platform comparability to foster fair competition while preserving platform dynamism, aligning with both domestic market conditions and global digital governance trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.ld27888
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Self-Preferencing in China: Towards a Lenient Approach

Chengxi Wu
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Regulating Self-Preferencing in China: Towards a Lenient Approach

Chengxi Wu
article en

Abstract

This article examines the regulatory approach to self-preferencing by digital platforms in China, arguing for a lenient rather than stringent framework. Through comparative analysis of international casessuch as the EU s structural interventions and the behavioral remedies adopted in South Korea and the United Statesthe study highlights the risks of strict regulation in stifling innovation, disrupting ecosystem synergies, and undermining data-driven efficiency gains. It further explores how consumer heterogeneity, particularly between loyal and switching consumers, naturally constrains abusive self-preferencing. The article concludes that China should embrace conduct-based regulatory tools such as algorithmic transparency and cross-platform comparability to foster fair competition while preserving platform dynamism, aligning with both domestic market conditions and global digital governance trends.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 107(1)
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulating Self-Preferencing in China: Towards a Lenient Approach — Chengxi Wu · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS