Comparative study of mechanical performance and durability of concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious materials

This study investigates different supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) as partial substitution for Portland limestone cement in concrete. Five natural pozzolans (two grades of metakaolin, diatomaceous earth, wollastonite, and pumice) and three industrial by-products/wastes (recycled glass powder, Class F fly ash, and reclaimed fly ash) were tested for their chemical reactivity. Those that were classified as reactive were incorporated into concrete at 10, 20, or 40 wt.% of cement. According to results, concretes containing natural pozzolans required significantly higher contents of both superplasticizer and air-entraining admixture, while those with other SCMs required increases only in the air-entraining admixture. The natural pozzolans provided superior compressive strength and durability. The recycled glass powder did not perform as well as the natural pozzolans, however, provided better strength and durability than the fly ashes. The results highlight advantages of performance-based design when using alternative SCMs, especially with the scarcity and increasing price of conventional ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2025-0184
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of mechanical performance and durability of concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious materials

Saeid Ghasemalizadeh, Rahil Khoshnazar, Ahmed G. Mehairi, Shadab Khan
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Comparative study of mechanical performance and durability of concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious materials

Saeid Ghasemalizadeh, Rahil Khoshnazar, Ahmed G. Mehairi, Shadab Khan
article en

Abstract

This study investigates different supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) as partial substitution for Portland limestone cement in concrete. Five natural pozzolans (two grades of metakaolin, diatomaceous earth, wollastonite, and pumice) and three industrial by-products/wastes (recycled glass powder, Class F fly ash, and reclaimed fly ash) were tested for their chemical reactivity. Those that were classified as reactive were incorporated into concrete at 10, 20, or 40 wt.% of cement. According to results, concretes containing natural pozzolans required significantly higher contents of both superplasticizer and air-entraining admixture, while those with other SCMs required increases only in the air-entraining admixture. The natural pozzolans provided superior compressive strength and durability. The recycled glass powder did not perform as well as the natural pozzolans, however, provided better strength and durability than the fly ashes. The results highlight advantages of performance-based design when using alternative SCMs, especially with the scarcity and increasing price of conventional ones.

Canadian Journal of Civil EngineeringVol. 53
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.