Predictive Modeling of DNA Damage Outcomes: Classification of Mutational Determinants Using Augmented Machine Learning Techniques

The mutational outcome of DNA damage as a direct result of constant chemical assault is governed by major factors, including the structure and nature of damage, replication, and repair machinery <i>in vivo</i>. The role of the size of the adduct, adduct-flanking bases, and the type of polymerase involved in the replication pathway is prominently seen through existing <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies. In this work, machine learning methods have been developed to predict the critical parameters for the mutational outcome of the adducts when they encounter polymerase in a particular sequence context. We carried out the analysis with three different classification models: Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Using the literature data, mutational results of covalent DNA adducts and abasic sites were used to train the classification models. Following this, we used a generative network method with the available information on the structure of the DNA damage, polymerase, and sequence context to generate synthetic data that accurately mirrors the real data. Further, we employed an Extreme Gradient Boosting Classifier to identify the parameter that most influences the DNA mutational outcome. Metrics such as Accuracy, Sensitivity, Precision, F1 score, and AUC value have been used to evaluate the performance of classifier methods. The proposed Bootstrapped-Variational Autoencoder (BT-VAE) model enhanced the overall prediction accuracy of classifiers by 40%. The SVM model delivered the best performance across all classification metrics in predicting mutational outcomes among the three classification models evaluated. By providing the size of the carcinogen/covalent DNA adduct, polymerase, and flanking base as input, the proposed BT-VAE framework can predict the mutational outcome (match or mismatch for covalent DNA adducts and adenine or nonadenine for abasic site), an additional tool for <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> studies in the field of toxicology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00137
Primary Topic
DNA Repair Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Modeling of DNA Damage Outcomes: Classification of Mutational Determinants Using Augmented Machine Learning Techniques

David Paul Elisa Dayanidhi, V.G. Vaidyanathan, Swamiraj Nithiyanantha Vasagam, surabhya Balasubramanian et al.
Chemical Research in Toxicology
DNA Repair Mechanisms
article

Predictive Modeling of DNA Damage Outcomes: Classification of Mutational Determinants Using Augmented Machine Learning Techniques

David Paul Elisa Dayanidhi, V.G. Vaidyanathan, Swamiraj Nithiyanantha Vasagam, surabhya Balasubramanian, K Varada Rajkumar, Harini Velmurugan, Ravikumar Bhoopalan
article en

Abstract

The mutational outcome of DNA damage as a direct result of constant chemical assault is governed by major factors, including the structure and nature of damage, replication, and repair machinery <i>in vivo</i>. The role of the size of the adduct, adduct-flanking bases, and the type of polymerase involved in the replication pathway is prominently seen through existing <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies. In this work, machine learning methods have been developed to predict the critical parameters for the mutational outcome of the adducts when they encounter polymerase in a particular sequence context. We carried out the analysis with three different classification models: Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Using the literature data, mutational results of covalent DNA adducts and abasic sites were used to train the classification models. Following this, we used a generative network method with the available information on the structure of the DNA damage, polymerase, and sequence context to generate synthetic data that accurately mirrors the real data. Further, we employed an Extreme Gradient Boosting Classifier to identify the parameter that most influences the DNA mutational outcome. Metrics such as Accuracy, Sensitivity, Precision, F1 score, and AUC value have been used to evaluate the performance of classifier methods. The proposed Bootstrapped-Variational Autoencoder (BT-VAE) model enhanced the overall prediction accuracy of classifiers by 40%. The SVM model delivered the best performance across all classification metrics in predicting mutational outcomes among the three classification models evaluated. By providing the size of the carcinogen/covalent DNA adduct, polymerase, and flanking base as input, the proposed BT-VAE framework can predict the mutational outcome (match or mismatch for covalent DNA adducts and adenine or nonadenine for abasic site), an additional tool for <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> studies in the field of toxicology.

Chemical Research in ToxicologyVol. 38(11)
Central Leather Research Institute (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
DNA Repair Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.