Comparisons between face-to-face and telephone speech

This pilot study aims at comparing two speech corpora in order to capture possible features of two different speech formats. The first corpus is a face-to-face speech corpus, the C-ORAL-BRASIL I (Raso and Mello, 2012) and the second corpus is a phone call corpus, part of the C-ORAL-BRASIL II (Raso; Mello; Ferrari, to appear), both in spontaneous informal Brazilian Portuguese. Through a pipeline prepared in Python, we compared: illocutionary complexity, informational density, overlapping, and disfluencies. Our results indicated that the speakers in the telephone calls had to use more vocal elements to convey a message while in face-to-face interactions the message would be divided in speech and gestures. The findings will be of interest to those who deal with speech corpora in different formats and are interested in selecting certain features for the comparison. Furthermore, this study has methodological ramifications because the elements examined here are very likely to occur in spontaneous speech in any format, and need to be compared carefully.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Sciences
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v14i00.20389
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisons between face-to-face and telephone speech

Átila Augusto Soares Vital, João Victor Pessoa Rocha
1 citations
Journal of Speech Sciences
Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
2.48
article

Comparisons between face-to-face and telephone speech

Átila Augusto Soares Vital, João Victor Pessoa Rocha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This pilot study aims at comparing two speech corpora in order to capture possible features of two different speech formats. The first corpus is a face-to-face speech corpus, the C-ORAL-BRASIL I (Raso and Mello, 2012) and the second corpus is a phone call corpus, part of the C-ORAL-BRASIL II (Raso; Mello; Ferrari, to appear), both in spontaneous informal Brazilian Portuguese. Through a pipeline prepared in Python, we compared: illocutionary complexity, informational density, overlapping, and disfluencies. Our results indicated that the speakers in the telephone calls had to use more vocal elements to convey a message while in face-to-face interactions the message would be divided in speech and gestures. The findings will be of interest to those who deal with speech corpora in different formats and are interested in selecting certain features for the comparison. Furthermore, this study has methodological ramifications because the elements examined here are very likely to occur in spontaneous speech in any format, and need to be compared carefully.

Journal of Speech SciencesVol. 14
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparisons between face-to-face and telephone speech — Átila Augusto Soares Vital, João Victor Pessoa Rocha · Journal of Speech Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS