Mixed Meal Versus Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening: A Diagnostic and Metabolic Comparison in Pregnancy

Objective: To compare glucose, insulin, and C-peptide responses following the 75 g oral glucose tol erance test (OGTT) and a standardized mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) in healthy pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MMTT in identifying ges tational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: In this prospective methodological crossover study, 22 pregnant women underwent both a 75 g OGTT and a standardized 594 kcal MMTT on separate fasting days. Blood samples were collected at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes to measure glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. Subgroup anal yses were based on GDM status. ROC analysis assessed the diagnostic value of MMTT glucose levels. Results: In the non-GDM group, OGTT produced higher glucose levels between 30 and 120 minutes, while MMTT showed a more gradual profile with an early insulin peak at 30 minutes. In GDM, early phase insulin and C-peptide responses were reduced and delayed, with prolonged elevations during the late postprandial phase. Both tests identified these impairments, but MMTT exhibited a more physiologic and balanced response. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that MMTT glucose at 120 minutes (>111 mg/dL) and 150 minutes (>91 mg/dL) had area under the curves of 0.818 and 0.819, with sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 94.1%, and 99% and 64.7%, respec tively. Follow-up of 5 GDM cases during and after pregnancy added clinical value. Conclusion: Mixed meal tolerance test revealed early-phase hormonal defects in a more physiologic pattern, possibly reflecting compensatory responses in milder GDM. While limited by a small GDM sample size, its diagnostic potential and standardized design warrant further investigation in larger cohorts. Cite this article as: Polat Korkmaz O, Bicer E, Madazlı R, Konukoglu D, Siva ZO. Mixed meal versus oral glucose tolerance test for gestational diabetes mellitus screening: A diagnostic and metabolic comparison in pregnancy. Endocrinol Res Pract. 2025;29(4):306-313.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Endocrinology research and practice.
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/erp.2025.25722
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed Meal Versus Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening: A Diagnostic and Metabolic Comparison in Pregnancy

Dildar Konukoğlu, Rıza Madazlı, Özge Polat Korkmaz, Zeynep Oşar Şiva et al.
Endocrinology research and practice.
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Mixed Meal Versus Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening: A Diagnostic and Metabolic Comparison in Pregnancy

Dildar Konukoğlu, Rıza Madazlı, Özge Polat Korkmaz, Zeynep Oşar Şiva, Elifnur Biçer
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare glucose, insulin, and C-peptide responses following the 75 g oral glucose tol erance test (OGTT) and a standardized mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) in healthy pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MMTT in identifying ges tational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: In this prospective methodological crossover study, 22 pregnant women underwent both a 75 g OGTT and a standardized 594 kcal MMTT on separate fasting days. Blood samples were collected at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes to measure glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. Subgroup anal yses were based on GDM status. ROC analysis assessed the diagnostic value of MMTT glucose levels. Results: In the non-GDM group, OGTT produced higher glucose levels between 30 and 120 minutes, while MMTT showed a more gradual profile with an early insulin peak at 30 minutes. In GDM, early phase insulin and C-peptide responses were reduced and delayed, with prolonged elevations during the late postprandial phase. Both tests identified these impairments, but MMTT exhibited a more physiologic and balanced response. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that MMTT glucose at 120 minutes (>111 mg/dL) and 150 minutes (>91 mg/dL) had area under the curves of 0.818 and 0.819, with sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 94.1%, and 99% and 64.7%, respec tively. Follow-up of 5 GDM cases during and after pregnancy added clinical value. Conclusion: Mixed meal tolerance test revealed early-phase hormonal defects in a more physiologic pattern, possibly reflecting compensatory responses in milder GDM. While limited by a small GDM sample size, its diagnostic potential and standardized design warrant further investigation in larger cohorts. Cite this article as: Polat Korkmaz O, Bicer E, Madazlı R, Konukoglu D, Siva ZO. Mixed meal versus oral glucose tolerance test for gestational diabetes mellitus screening: A diagnostic and metabolic comparison in pregnancy. Endocrinol Res Pract. 2025;29(4):306-313.

Endocrinology research and practice.Vol. 29(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.