Bridging Perspectives: Academic and Practitioner Knowledge on Collective Impact for Social Innovation and Nonprofit Organizations

Abstract This article compares the knowledge produced by the academic and practical communities regarding the collective impact (CI) approach to social innovation, exploring its implications for the fields of social innovation and nonprofit organizations. We conducted a literature review of articles published in journals focused on practitioners and academic journals, covering the approach's first ten years (2011–2021). The findings highlight seven key themes of comparison. They concern different understandings of CI, various fields of application, equity in the CI approach, CI application in advocacy initiatives, criticisms of the CI approach, real-world applications and methodological approaches, and the importance of community integration and a bottom-up approach in CI. The article's contributions revolve around building a bridge between the knowledge produced by each community and providing a critical analysis of key themes addressed by them, including equity, cross-sector collaboration, and advocacy, while connecting empirical findings to both theoretical and practical implications for NPOs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-025-00781-9
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Perspectives: Academic and Practitioner Knowledge on Collective Impact for Social Innovation and Nonprofit Organizations

Bruna de Morais Holanda
VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Bridging Perspectives: Academic and Practitioner Knowledge on Collective Impact for Social Innovation and Nonprofit Organizations

Bruna de Morais Holanda
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article compares the knowledge produced by the academic and practical communities regarding the collective impact (CI) approach to social innovation, exploring its implications for the fields of social innovation and nonprofit organizations. We conducted a literature review of articles published in journals focused on practitioners and academic journals, covering the approach's first ten years (2011–2021). The findings highlight seven key themes of comparison. They concern different understandings of CI, various fields of application, equity in the CI approach, CI application in advocacy initiatives, criticisms of the CI approach, real-world applications and methodological approaches, and the importance of community integration and a bottom-up approach in CI. The article's contributions revolve around building a bridge between the knowledge produced by each community and providing a critical analysis of key themes addressed by them, including equity, cross-sector collaboration, and advocacy, while connecting empirical findings to both theoretical and practical implications for NPOs.

VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit OrganizationsVol. 36(6)
Institute of Biomedical Science (GB), Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.