Kettlebell Training vs. Plyometric Training: A Comparison of Jump Performance in Volleyball and Basketball Athletes

<b>Objectives:</b> Plyometric training is a well-established method for enhancing jump performance in basketball and volleyball athletes but has certain limitations. Kettlebell training may provide a viable alternative as it mimics key biomechanical aspects of jumping, like explosive hip and knee extension during a ballistic hip-hinge pattern. Because evidence remains limited, this study aimed to compare the effects of both training methods. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-eight volleyball and basketball club athletes (age: 22 (4.3); male = 29, female = 9) completed this study. Countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), drop jump (DJ), body fat percentage (FM), and muscle mass percentage (MM) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. The participants were assigned to one of three groups: a kettlebell training group (KbG), a plyometric training group (PG), or a control group (CG). Both the KbG and PG completed two supervised 25-min training sessions per week for six weeks, while the CG did not engage in any additional training intervention. The level of significance was set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences in CMJ, SJ, and DJ performance between the groups before the intervention. Significant differences in change between the groups from pre- to post-test were found for the SJ (<i>p</i> = 0.006), but not for the DJ (<i>p</i> = 0.06), CMJ (<i>p</i> = 0.26), FM (<i>p</i> = 0.9), and MM (<i>p</i> = 0.55). Pairwise comparisons revealed significantly greater positive change in the KbG than in the CG for the SJ (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and DJ (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in the KbG for the CMJ (<i>p</i> = 0.04), SJ (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and DJ (<i>p</i> = 0.003) performance, whereas FM and MM did not change. Within the PG and CG, no significant change occurred. <b>Conclusions:</b> Kettlebell training effectively improved jump performance and may therefore serve as a valuable component within strength and conditioning programs for basketball and volleyball athletes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10040395
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kettlebell Training vs. Plyometric Training: A Comparison of Jump Performance in Volleyball and Basketball Athletes

L. G. Koch, David Ohlendorf, Annette M. Schmidt, Tom Brandt et al.
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Kettlebell Training vs. Plyometric Training: A Comparison of Jump Performance in Volleyball and Basketball Athletes

L. G. Koch, David Ohlendorf, Annette M. Schmidt, Tom Brandt, Maximilian Herber
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> Plyometric training is a well-established method for enhancing jump performance in basketball and volleyball athletes but has certain limitations. Kettlebell training may provide a viable alternative as it mimics key biomechanical aspects of jumping, like explosive hip and knee extension during a ballistic hip-hinge pattern. Because evidence remains limited, this study aimed to compare the effects of both training methods. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-eight volleyball and basketball club athletes (age: 22 (4.3); male = 29, female = 9) completed this study. Countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), drop jump (DJ), body fat percentage (FM), and muscle mass percentage (MM) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. The participants were assigned to one of three groups: a kettlebell training group (KbG), a plyometric training group (PG), or a control group (CG). Both the KbG and PG completed two supervised 25-min training sessions per week for six weeks, while the CG did not engage in any additional training intervention. The level of significance was set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences in CMJ, SJ, and DJ performance between the groups before the intervention. Significant differences in change between the groups from pre- to post-test were found for the SJ (<i>p</i> = 0.006), but not for the DJ (<i>p</i> = 0.06), CMJ (<i>p</i> = 0.26), FM (<i>p</i> = 0.9), and MM (<i>p</i> = 0.55). Pairwise comparisons revealed significantly greater positive change in the KbG than in the CG for the SJ (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and DJ (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in the KbG for the CMJ (<i>p</i> = 0.04), SJ (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and DJ (<i>p</i> = 0.003) performance, whereas FM and MM did not change. Within the PG and CG, no significant change occurred. <b>Conclusions:</b> Kettlebell training effectively improved jump performance and may therefore serve as a valuable component within strength and conditioning programs for basketball and volleyball athletes.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(4)
Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.