Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Although various regional anesthesia techniques are commonly used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), to date, no randomized controlled trial has compared the effectiveness of Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block (QLB) and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block (EOIPB) in LC. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided QLB and EOIPB in providing postoperative analgesia after LC. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: In this two-center, randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing LC were divided into QLB and EOIPB groups. Our primary outcome was the postoperative pain scores measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at predetermined intervals. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (RSAS) score, and patient satisfaction. <i>Results</i>: The NRS pain scores at postoperative 30th minute, 4th, 12th, and 24th hours were significantly lower in the QLB group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients in the QLB group required significantly less tramadol compared to the EOIPB group (<i>p</i> < 0.000). The QLB group also demonstrated lower RSAS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.005), indicating a smoother recovery process. Patient satisfaction scores were markedly higher in the QLB group (<i>p</i> < 0.000). Although both blocks were well-tolerated with no differences in side effects, EOIPB was associated with higher opioid consumption, indicating its relatively limited effectiveness. <i>Conclusions</i>: To conclude, this study highlights that QLB is a more effective option for postoperative analgesia and improves patient satisfaction after LC. EOIPB may serve as a viable alternative for some patients; however, given the advantages of QLB in pain control and recovery, it stands out as a more preferable method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101838
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Erhan Gökçek, Osman Uzundere, Enes Çelik, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar et al.
Medicina
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Erhan Gökçek, Osman Uzundere, Enes Çelik, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Fatma Acıl, Hakan Akelma, Okan Andıç, Hülya Tosun-Söner
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Although various regional anesthesia techniques are commonly used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), to date, no randomized controlled trial has compared the effectiveness of Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block (QLB) and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block (EOIPB) in LC. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided QLB and EOIPB in providing postoperative analgesia after LC. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: In this two-center, randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing LC were divided into QLB and EOIPB groups. Our primary outcome was the postoperative pain scores measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at predetermined intervals. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (RSAS) score, and patient satisfaction. <i>Results</i>: The NRS pain scores at postoperative 30th minute, 4th, 12th, and 24th hours were significantly lower in the QLB group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients in the QLB group required significantly less tramadol compared to the EOIPB group (<i>p</i> < 0.000). The QLB group also demonstrated lower RSAS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.005), indicating a smoother recovery process. Patient satisfaction scores were markedly higher in the QLB group (<i>p</i> < 0.000). Although both blocks were well-tolerated with no differences in side effects, EOIPB was associated with higher opioid consumption, indicating its relatively limited effectiveness. <i>Conclusions</i>: To conclude, this study highlights that QLB is a more effective option for postoperative analgesia and improves patient satisfaction after LC. EOIPB may serve as a viable alternative for some patients; however, given the advantages of QLB in pain control and recovery, it stands out as a more preferable method.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
Mardin Artuklu University (TR), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.