Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China

Coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs in southwestern China are characterized by thick, multi-layered coal sequences partitioned into several independent pressure systems by impermeable strata. Commingled production from multiple coal seams in such multi-superposed CBM systems often suffers from severe inter-layer interference, leading to suboptimal gas recovery. To address this challenge, we developed a systematic four-step optimization workflow integrating geological data screening, pressure compartmentalization analysis, and numerical reservoir simulation. The workflow identifies the key “main” coal seams and evaluates various co-production layer combinations to maximize gas recovery while minimizing negative interference. We applied this method to a CBM well (LC-C2) in the Western Guizhou–Eastern Yunnan region, which penetrates three discrete CBM pressure systems. In the case study, single-layer simulations first revealed that one seam (No. 7 + 8) contributed over 30% of the total gas potential, with a few other seams (e.g., No. 18, 13, 4, 16) providing moderate contributions and many seams yielding negligible gas. Guided by these results, we simulated five commingling scenarios of increasing complexity. The optimal scenario was to co-produce the seams from the two higher-pressure systems (a total of six seams) while excluding the low-pressure shallow seams. This optimal six-seam configuration achieved a 10-year cumulative gas production of approximately 2.53 × 106 m3 (about 700 m3/day average)—roughly 75% higher than producing the main seam alone, and even about 15% greater than a scenario involving all available seams. In contrast, including all three pressure systems (ten seams) led to interference effects where the high-pressure seams dominated flow and the low-pressure seams contributed little, resulting in lower overall recovery. The findings demonstrate that more is not always better in multi-seam CBM production. By intelligently selecting a moderate number of compatible seams for co-production, the reservoir’s gas can be extracted more efficiently. The proposed quantitative optimization approach provides a practical tool for designing multi-seam CBM wells and can be broadly applied to similar geologically compartmentalized reservoirs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103280
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China

Fangkai Quan, Zhengyuan Qin, Hongji Li, Haiying Wang et al.
Processes
Coal Properties and Utilization
article

Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China

Fangkai Quan, Zhengyuan Qin, Hongji Li, Haiying Wang, Lu Wei, Tengwei Song
article en

Abstract

Coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs in southwestern China are characterized by thick, multi-layered coal sequences partitioned into several independent pressure systems by impermeable strata. Commingled production from multiple coal seams in such multi-superposed CBM systems often suffers from severe inter-layer interference, leading to suboptimal gas recovery. To address this challenge, we developed a systematic four-step optimization workflow integrating geological data screening, pressure compartmentalization analysis, and numerical reservoir simulation. The workflow identifies the key “main” coal seams and evaluates various co-production layer combinations to maximize gas recovery while minimizing negative interference. We applied this method to a CBM well (LC-C2) in the Western Guizhou–Eastern Yunnan region, which penetrates three discrete CBM pressure systems. In the case study, single-layer simulations first revealed that one seam (No. 7 + 8) contributed over 30% of the total gas potential, with a few other seams (e.g., No. 18, 13, 4, 16) providing moderate contributions and many seams yielding negligible gas. Guided by these results, we simulated five commingling scenarios of increasing complexity. The optimal scenario was to co-produce the seams from the two higher-pressure systems (a total of six seams) while excluding the low-pressure shallow seams. This optimal six-seam configuration achieved a 10-year cumulative gas production of approximately 2.53 × 106 m3 (about 700 m3/day average)—roughly 75% higher than producing the main seam alone, and even about 15% greater than a scenario involving all available seams. In contrast, including all three pressure systems (ten seams) led to interference effects where the high-pressure seams dominated flow and the low-pressure seams contributed little, resulting in lower overall recovery. The findings demonstrate that more is not always better in multi-seam CBM production. By intelligently selecting a moderate number of compatible seams for co-production, the reservoir’s gas can be extracted more efficiently. The proposed quantitative optimization approach provides a practical tool for designing multi-seam CBM wells and can be broadly applied to similar geologically compartmentalized reservoirs.

ProcessesVol. 13(10)
University of Nottingham (GB), Anhui University of Science and Technology (CN), Gansu Coalfield Geology Bureau (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Anhui University, Anhui University of Science and Technology, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Coal Properties and Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.