From Macroeconomic Uncertainty to FX Returns: The Role of Realized Volatility in Shaping Risk‐Return Dynamics

ABSTRACT The paper proposes a theoretical model with variance‐belief formation to investigate the relationship among macroeconomic uncertainty (abbreviated as MU), the conditional variance of the exchange rate, and exchange rate returns. The model posits a weak, even negative, intertemporal and negative contemporaneous risk‐return or MU‐return relationship if agents possess biased, slow‐moving expectations. The empirical study, which utilizes multi‐currency data, corroborates the negative risk‐return relationship. However, the significance of the MU‐return relationship is contingent upon the extent to which the MU proxy captures the uncertainty surrounding economic fundamentals associated with exchange rates comprehensively. In summary, this study offers more insight into the role of fundamentals in exchange rate movements and the risk‐return relationship in FX markets with a focus on MU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Economics
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70023
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Macroeconomic Uncertainty to FX Returns: The Role of Realized Volatility in Shaping Risk‐Return Dynamics

Xiangyun Xu, Lijuan Xie, Cong Yu, Bin Lu
Review of International Economics
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

From Macroeconomic Uncertainty to FX Returns: The Role of Realized Volatility in Shaping Risk‐Return Dynamics

Xiangyun Xu, Lijuan Xie, Cong Yu, Bin Lu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper proposes a theoretical model with variance‐belief formation to investigate the relationship among macroeconomic uncertainty (abbreviated as MU), the conditional variance of the exchange rate, and exchange rate returns. The model posits a weak, even negative, intertemporal and negative contemporaneous risk‐return or MU‐return relationship if agents possess biased, slow‐moving expectations. The empirical study, which utilizes multi‐currency data, corroborates the negative risk‐return relationship. However, the significance of the MU‐return relationship is contingent upon the extent to which the MU proxy captures the uncertainty surrounding economic fundamentals associated with exchange rates comprehensively. In summary, this study offers more insight into the role of fundamentals in exchange rate movements and the risk‐return relationship in FX markets with a focus on MU.

Review of International EconomicsVol. 34(1)
Anhui University of Finance and Economics (CN), Nanjing Audit University (CN), Institute of Economics (CN), Tongling University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Macroeconomic Uncertainty to FX Returns: The Role of Realized Volatility in Shaping Risk‐Return Dynamics — Xiangyun Xu, Lijuan Xie, et al. · Review of International Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS