An interview study on socially assistive robots and professional care relationships

BackgroundThe shortage of skilled healthcare workers, intensified by demographic change, has stimulated interest in robotic solutions for elderly care. While assistive robots typically perform practical tasks, socially assistive robots (SARs) are increasingly taking on communicative and relational roles, raising ethical concerns. Critics fear that SARs will disrupt the professional caregiver-client relationship and replace, rather than complement, human workers.AimThis study explores how SARs influence the professional care relationships and the professional self-understanding.Research designA qualitative interpretive study design.Participants and research contextUsing a constructivist grounded theory approach, we analyzed twelve semi-structured interviews with professional caregivers experienced in using SARs in Germany and four additional interviews with stakeholders involved in their development and implementation (2023-2024).Ethical considerationsThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Potsdam (No. 84/2022).ResultsCaregivers initially feared that SARs would replace the relational and emotional dimensions of care. However, practical experience changed their perspective. Instead of seeing SARs as substitutes, caregivers came to view them as part of a triadic care model involving the caregiver, the client, and the robot. This model reinforces the central role of caregivers in integrating SARs while maintaining emotional and relational care. SARs were accepted as tools to reduce physical workload, but caregivers emphasized that emotional support and relationship-building must remain human tasks.ConclusionUsing SARs reshapes the perspective of caregivers, fostering a triadic relationship in which they remain central. They act as mediators, ensuring that SARs function as supportive tools rather than substitutes. Caregivers set ethical boundaries, prioritizing human empathy and relational care. This evolving role highlights the continued importance of the human presence in care, even as robotic technologies advance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251385025
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An interview study on socially assistive robots and professional care relationships

M.J. Bubeck, Robert Ranisch, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Corinna Klingler et al.
Nursing Ethics
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

An interview study on socially assistive robots and professional care relationships

M.J. Bubeck, Robert Ranisch, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Corinna Klingler, Clara Victoria Keusgen
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe shortage of skilled healthcare workers, intensified by demographic change, has stimulated interest in robotic solutions for elderly care. While assistive robots typically perform practical tasks, socially assistive robots (SARs) are increasingly taking on communicative and relational roles, raising ethical concerns. Critics fear that SARs will disrupt the professional caregiver-client relationship and replace, rather than complement, human workers.AimThis study explores how SARs influence the professional care relationships and the professional self-understanding.Research designA qualitative interpretive study design.Participants and research contextUsing a constructivist grounded theory approach, we analyzed twelve semi-structured interviews with professional caregivers experienced in using SARs in Germany and four additional interviews with stakeholders involved in their development and implementation (2023-2024).Ethical considerationsThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Potsdam (No. 84/2022).ResultsCaregivers initially feared that SARs would replace the relational and emotional dimensions of care. However, practical experience changed their perspective. Instead of seeing SARs as substitutes, caregivers came to view them as part of a triadic care model involving the caregiver, the client, and the robot. This model reinforces the central role of caregivers in integrating SARs while maintaining emotional and relational care. SARs were accepted as tools to reduce physical workload, but caregivers emphasized that emotional support and relationship-building must remain human tasks.ConclusionUsing SARs reshapes the perspective of caregivers, fostering a triadic relationship in which they remain central. They act as mediators, ensuring that SARs function as supportive tools rather than substitutes. Caregivers set ethical boundaries, prioritizing human empathy and relational care. This evolving role highlights the continued importance of the human presence in care, even as robotic technologies advance.

Nursing EthicsVol. 33(2)
University of Potsdam (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.