Dosimetric and radiobiological benefits of patient-specific respiratory motion management for liver tumor stereotactic body radiotherapy

Respiratory motion management was crucial importance in radiotherapy. Our study aimed to explore the dosimetric and radiobiological benefits of various respiratory motion management strategies in liver tumor patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Respiratory motion images of 23 liver tumor patients were obtained by 4DCT scan under abdominal compression (AC) and free-breathing (FB). Group A included all 23 patients, while group B focused on 11 patients with tumors < 5 cm in diameter. Dosimetric and radiobiological parameters were recorded and compared across three treatment plans for each patient: Plan<sub>FB</sub>, Plan<sub>AC</sub>, and Plan<sub>GAT(Respiratory gating)</sub>. For dosimetric parameters, compared to Plan<sub>AC</sub>, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> further significantly reduced liver D<sub>mean</sub>, V<sub>d<21.5 Gy</sub>, V<sub>10Gy</sub>; right kidney D<sub>mean</sub>; duodenum D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, <sub>1cc</sub>, <sub>5cc</sub>, <sub>10cc</sub>; intestine D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, <sub>5cc</sub>, <sub>10cc</sub>; stomach D<sub>mean</sub> and spinal cord D<sub>mean</sub>, V<sub>5Gy</sub> in group A; however, in Group B, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> only showed significantly reductions in liver D<sub>mean</sub> and duodenum D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>5cc</sub>, <sub>10cc</sub>. In terms of radiobiology, compared with Plan<sub>FB</sub>, Plan<sub>AC</sub> significantly reduced liver NTCP (p = 0.033) in Group B, whereas no difference was observed in Group A (p = 0.231). Additionally, compared to Plan<sub>AC</sub>, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> further reduced liver NTCP (p = 0.001), liver EUD (p < 0.001) and right kidney EUD (p < 0.001) in Group A; however, in Group B, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> did not significantly decrease liver NTCP (p = 0.136), indicating that AC offers comparable benefits to GAT. The Pearson's correlations between the reductions in dosimetric and radiobiological parameters and tumor motion or target volume were stronger in Group B than in Group A under AC. So, GAT provides the greatest dosimetric and radiobiological benefits for liver tumors treated with SBRT, while AC offers comparable benefits for liver tumors with < 5 cm in diameter. Thus, given its technical simplicity, AC is recommended for liver tumors < 5 cm in diameter undergoing SBRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19218-w
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric and radiobiological benefits of patient-specific respiratory motion management for liver tumor stereotactic body radiotherapy

Jiangshan Li, Q. Chen, Zhenhang Xu, Jiaxiang Gao et al.
Scientific Reports
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Dosimetric and radiobiological benefits of patient-specific respiratory motion management for liver tumor stereotactic body radiotherapy

Jiangshan Li, Q. Chen, Zhenhang Xu, Jiaxiang Gao, Xiaodong Wu, Hong Lei, Yuangui Chen, Tao Xu, Miaoyun Huang
article en

Abstract

Respiratory motion management was crucial importance in radiotherapy. Our study aimed to explore the dosimetric and radiobiological benefits of various respiratory motion management strategies in liver tumor patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Respiratory motion images of 23 liver tumor patients were obtained by 4DCT scan under abdominal compression (AC) and free-breathing (FB). Group A included all 23 patients, while group B focused on 11 patients with tumors < 5 cm in diameter. Dosimetric and radiobiological parameters were recorded and compared across three treatment plans for each patient: Plan<sub>FB</sub>, Plan<sub>AC</sub>, and Plan<sub>GAT(Respiratory gating)</sub>. For dosimetric parameters, compared to Plan<sub>AC</sub>, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> further significantly reduced liver D<sub>mean</sub>, V<sub>d<21.5 Gy</sub>, V<sub>10Gy</sub>; right kidney D<sub>mean</sub>; duodenum D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, <sub>1cc</sub>, <sub>5cc</sub>, <sub>10cc</sub>; intestine D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, <sub>5cc</sub>, <sub>10cc</sub>; stomach D<sub>mean</sub> and spinal cord D<sub>mean</sub>, V<sub>5Gy</sub> in group A; however, in Group B, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> only showed significantly reductions in liver D<sub>mean</sub> and duodenum D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>5cc</sub>, <sub>10cc</sub>. In terms of radiobiology, compared with Plan<sub>FB</sub>, Plan<sub>AC</sub> significantly reduced liver NTCP (p = 0.033) in Group B, whereas no difference was observed in Group A (p = 0.231). Additionally, compared to Plan<sub>AC</sub>, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> further reduced liver NTCP (p = 0.001), liver EUD (p < 0.001) and right kidney EUD (p < 0.001) in Group A; however, in Group B, Plan<sub>GAT</sub> did not significantly decrease liver NTCP (p = 0.136), indicating that AC offers comparable benefits to GAT. The Pearson's correlations between the reductions in dosimetric and radiobiological parameters and tumor motion or target volume were stronger in Group B than in Group A under AC. So, GAT provides the greatest dosimetric and radiobiological benefits for liver tumors treated with SBRT, while AC offers comparable benefits for liver tumors with < 5 cm in diameter. Thus, given its technical simplicity, AC is recommended for liver tumors < 5 cm in diameter undergoing SBRT.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Medical Research Associates (US), Union Hospital (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.