Transgender and Nonbinary People's Perceptions of Their State Context, Gender Minority Stress, and Mental Health: A Mixed Methods Study

ABSTRACT Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) people experience gender minority stressors that adversely affect their mental health and wellbeing, all of which are shaped by sociopolitical contexts. We explored TNB participants' ( N = 150) perceptions of how affirming their state was and associations with minority stress and mental health variables. Qualitative themes included: (1) Degrees of stigma depend on who you are; (2) Stigma persists even with small positive advancements; (3) Cis people take an ‘out of sight, out of mind’ approach to TNB people; and (4) It's in the air we breathe: Cissexism is an individual, cultural, and structural issue. Across states, 41.8% of participants described views towards TNB people as negative, 41.8% as mixed, 5% as positive, 3.2% as neutral, 2.5% were unsure, and 0.6% were coded as unclear. Depression, past year enacted stigma, and negative expectations were significantly higher in negative contexts than in mixed contexts. These findings suggest that stigma and marginalisation persist across contexts, including relatively supportive places, and emphasise the importance of understanding within‐state variability in terms of contextual drivers of mental health. Furthermore, anti‐trans political climates have significant implications for TNB people's mental health and wellbeing, as well as exposure to minority stressors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70187
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transgender and Nonbinary People's Perceptions of Their State Context, Gender Minority Stress, and Mental Health: A Mixed Methods Study

Devon Kimball, Richard A. Mocarski, Jae A. Puckett, Debra A. Hope et al.
1 citations
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
article

Transgender and Nonbinary People's Perceptions of Their State Context, Gender Minority Stress, and Mental Health: A Mixed Methods Study

Devon Kimball, Richard A. Mocarski, Jae A. Puckett, Debra A. Hope, L. Zachary DuBois, Mihael MacBeth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) people experience gender minority stressors that adversely affect their mental health and wellbeing, all of which are shaped by sociopolitical contexts. We explored TNB participants' ( N = 150) perceptions of how affirming their state was and associations with minority stress and mental health variables. Qualitative themes included: (1) Degrees of stigma depend on who you are; (2) Stigma persists even with small positive advancements; (3) Cis people take an ‘out of sight, out of mind’ approach to TNB people; and (4) It's in the air we breathe: Cissexism is an individual, cultural, and structural issue. Across states, 41.8% of participants described views towards TNB people as negative, 41.8% as mixed, 5% as positive, 3.2% as neutral, 2.5% were unsure, and 0.6% were coded as unclear. Depression, past year enacted stigma, and negative expectations were significantly higher in negative contexts than in mixed contexts. These findings suggest that stigma and marginalisation persist across contexts, including relatively supportive places, and emphasise the importance of understanding within‐state variability in terms of contextual drivers of mental health. Furthermore, anti‐trans political climates have significant implications for TNB people's mental health and wellbeing, as well as exposure to minority stressors.

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 35(6)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Oregon (US), San Jose State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.