When Security Overrides Transparency: The National Security Clause in Whistleblower Protection (Polish and EU Perspective)

Abstract This article examines how the undefined concept of “national security” in both the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive and the Polish Whistleblower Protection Act complicates the application of whistleblower safeguards. It highlights the practical challenges authorities face in determining when the national security exclusion applies, and calls for clear criteria and procedures to balance transparency and whistleblower protection with legitimate national interests. The article argues that the vague nature of this exception in both EU and Polish laws generates legal uncertainty and may enable Member States to circumvent whistleblower protections without adequate justification. The Polish Whistleblower Protection Act excludes disclosures related to national security, particularly those that would violate legal confidentiality. Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence, however, requires that such exclusions be grounded in a concrete threat to fundamental state interests. This creates a significant interpretive burden for administrative and judicial authorities, undermining legal certainty and consistent application of the law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central European Journal of Public Policy
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2025-0007
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Security Overrides Transparency: The National Security Clause in Whistleblower Protection (Polish and EU Perspective)

Małgorzata Grześków
Central European Journal of Public Policy
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
article

When Security Overrides Transparency: The National Security Clause in Whistleblower Protection (Polish and EU Perspective)

Małgorzata Grześków
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how the undefined concept of “national security” in both the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive and the Polish Whistleblower Protection Act complicates the application of whistleblower safeguards. It highlights the practical challenges authorities face in determining when the national security exclusion applies, and calls for clear criteria and procedures to balance transparency and whistleblower protection with legitimate national interests. The article argues that the vague nature of this exception in both EU and Polish laws generates legal uncertainty and may enable Member States to circumvent whistleblower protections without adequate justification. The Polish Whistleblower Protection Act excludes disclosures related to national security, particularly those that would violate legal confidentiality. Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence, however, requires that such exclusions be grounded in a concrete threat to fundamental state interests. This creates a significant interpretive burden for administrative and judicial authorities, undermining legal certainty and consistent application of the law.

Central European Journal of Public PolicyVol. 19(2)
Department of Administration (GU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Security Overrides Transparency: The National Security Clause in Whistleblower Protection (Polish and EU Perspective) — Małgorzata Grześków · Central European Journal of Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS