Identifying Going Concern Audit Opinions Using Supervised Machine Learning

ABSTRACT This paper evaluates the use of supervised machine learning to automatically identify going concern–modified audit reports. Models based on two different classifiers—logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting—achieve strong classification performance for this task. The same classifiers, along with naïve Bayes, also demonstrate strong performance in the ancillary task of identifying audit report pages in financial reports. These results have practical implications, including the application of the presented methods for timely accounting information retrieval for users, automated peer comparison for auditors, or as a data extraction method for researchers, particularly in settings with limited audit data availability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.70020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Going Concern Audit Opinions Using Supervised Machine Learning

Dennis Hedback
1 citations
Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
article

Identifying Going Concern Audit Opinions Using Supervised Machine Learning

Dennis Hedback
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper evaluates the use of supervised machine learning to automatically identify going concern–modified audit reports. Models based on two different classifiers—logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting—achieve strong classification performance for this task. The same classifiers, along with naïve Bayes, also demonstrate strong performance in the ancillary task of identifying audit report pages in financial reports. These results have practical implications, including the application of the presented methods for timely accounting information retrieval for users, automated peer comparison for auditors, or as a data extraction method for researchers, particularly in settings with limited audit data availability.

Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & managementVol. 32(4)
Mid Sweden University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.