Holistic principle in ecophilosophy and bioethics: comparative and analytical aspect

The aim of the study is to identify the common foundations and distinctive features of the holistic principle in ecophilosophy and bioethics, demonstrating their role as a conceptual basis for the ethics of survival and sustainable development in the context of the global challenges of the 21st century. The article analyzes the holistic approach as a methodological and worldview foundation of contemporary ecophilosophy and bioethics. Special attention is given to the connection of holism with the concepts of integrity, systemicity, and the interdependence of humans, nature, and culture. It is shown that holism in bioethics makes it possible to go beyond the individualistic understanding of medical morality and to expand the scope of bioethical analysis to the level of the biosphere and planetary responsibility. The article examines examples of philosophical interpretations and practical applications of holism in ecological and medical contexts. The scientific novelty lies in demonstrating how holism simultaneously functions as an ontological basis for ecophilosophy and as a normative framework for global bioethics, bridging natural sciences, medicine, and the humanities. The findings show that ecophilosophical holism highlights the ontological unity of nature and the interconnectedness of the biosphere and noosphere, while bioethical holism emphasizes the normative integration of medical, social, and ecological values, extending ethical reflection beyond individual medical practice to global contexts. Despite their differences, both approaches converge in rejecting reductionism and fostering a paradigm of holistic thinking, which provides a conceptual foundation for sustainable development and positions bioethics as an “ethics of survival” for the 21st century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manuscript
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30853/mns20250190
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holistic principle in ecophilosophy and bioethics: comparative and analytical aspect

Dzhamilia Ibragimovna Izmailova
Manuscript
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Holistic principle in ecophilosophy and bioethics: comparative and analytical aspect

Dzhamilia Ibragimovna Izmailova
article en

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify the common foundations and distinctive features of the holistic principle in ecophilosophy and bioethics, demonstrating their role as a conceptual basis for the ethics of survival and sustainable development in the context of the global challenges of the 21st century. The article analyzes the holistic approach as a methodological and worldview foundation of contemporary ecophilosophy and bioethics. Special attention is given to the connection of holism with the concepts of integrity, systemicity, and the interdependence of humans, nature, and culture. It is shown that holism in bioethics makes it possible to go beyond the individualistic understanding of medical morality and to expand the scope of bioethical analysis to the level of the biosphere and planetary responsibility. The article examines examples of philosophical interpretations and practical applications of holism in ecological and medical contexts. The scientific novelty lies in demonstrating how holism simultaneously functions as an ontological basis for ecophilosophy and as a normative framework for global bioethics, bridging natural sciences, medicine, and the humanities. The findings show that ecophilosophical holism highlights the ontological unity of nature and the interconnectedness of the biosphere and noosphere, while bioethical holism emphasizes the normative integration of medical, social, and ecological values, extending ethical reflection beyond individual medical practice to global contexts. Despite their differences, both approaches converge in rejecting reductionism and fostering a paradigm of holistic thinking, which provides a conceptual foundation for sustainable development and positions bioethics as an “ethics of survival” for the 21st century.

ManuscriptVol. 18(4)
Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.