Physical Activity and Exercise Intensity Terminology: A Joint American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Expert Statement and Exercise and Sport Science Australia (ESSA) Consensus Statement

The evidence supporting the many beneficial effects of physical activity, including exercise, is overwhelming. This has led to numerous publications, statements, and position stands providing evidence-based recommendations to realize the performance-enhancing and therapeutic benefits of exercise. However, one factor hampering research and limiting the adoption of these recommendations is the inconsistent use of terminology associated with different exercise intensities. The goal of this international group of researchers and practitioners, therefore, was to propose standardized physical activity and exercise intensity terminology that has utility across all ages, sexes, genders, physical abilities, conditions, applications, and activities. After much discussion, we propose a standard terminology for physical activity, exercise, and sport and human performance comprising five exercise intensities: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. We also propose five different descriptors for the perception of effort that align with the five intensities we have suggested: very easy, easy, somewhat hard, hard, and very hard. To enable consistent use of these descriptors with both cardiorespiratory and resistance exercise, we suggest not using descriptors such as light, heavy, weak, or strong (which might be perceived as only being applicable to describing load). We appreciate that some fields have long-established terminology and may be reluctant to change. Nonetheless, at a minimum, the terminology proposed here allows for more clarity when comparing the different exercise intensity descriptors currently used by different fields. Finally, we hope this will be an important "first step" in harmonizing the descriptions of exercise intensity across the fields of physical activity for public health, exercise science, and sport science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003795
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Activity and Exercise Intensity Terminology: A Joint American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Expert Statement and Exercise and Sport Science Australia (ESSA) Consensus Statement

C. Tzarimas, Keri L. Denay, Linda S. Pescatello, Samuel Headley et al.
18 citations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Physical Activity and Health
20.96
article

Physical Activity and Exercise Intensity Terminology: A Joint American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Expert Statement and Exercise and Sport Science Australia (ESSA) Consensus Statement

C. Tzarimas, Keri L. Denay, Linda S. Pescatello, Samuel Headley, Robert Usher Newton, Mary Elizabeth Jung, Nicholas J. Saner, Martin J. Gibala, ANDREW MARK JONES, Belinda R. Beck, David John Bishop, Stuart Biddle, Alessandra Ferri, Trine Tegdan Moholdt, Sophia Nimphius, Matthew J-C Lee
article en
18 citations

Abstract

The evidence supporting the many beneficial effects of physical activity, including exercise, is overwhelming. This has led to numerous publications, statements, and position stands providing evidence-based recommendations to realize the performance-enhancing and therapeutic benefits of exercise. However, one factor hampering research and limiting the adoption of these recommendations is the inconsistent use of terminology associated with different exercise intensities. The goal of this international group of researchers and practitioners, therefore, was to propose standardized physical activity and exercise intensity terminology that has utility across all ages, sexes, genders, physical abilities, conditions, applications, and activities. After much discussion, we propose a standard terminology for physical activity, exercise, and sport and human performance comprising five exercise intensities: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. We also propose five different descriptors for the perception of effort that align with the five intensities we have suggested: very easy, easy, somewhat hard, hard, and very hard. To enable consistent use of these descriptors with both cardiorespiratory and resistance exercise, we suggest not using descriptors such as light, heavy, weak, or strong (which might be perceived as only being applicable to describing load). We appreciate that some fields have long-established terminology and may be reluctant to change. Nonetheless, at a minimum, the terminology proposed here allows for more clarity when comparing the different exercise intensity descriptors currently used by different fields. Finally, we hope this will be an important "first step" in harmonizing the descriptions of exercise intensity across the fields of physical activity for public health, exercise science, and sport science.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(11)
Griffith University (AU), Edith Cowan University (AU), University of Connecticut (US), University of Southern Queensland (AU), University of Exeter (GB), University of Michigan (US), Nazarene Theological College (AU), Eastern Health (AU), South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (AU), LIKES – Foundation for Sport and Health Sciences (FI), Gold Coast Health (AU), Victoria University (AU), Okanagan University College (CA), Springfield College (US), University of Jyväskylä (FI), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Physical Activity and Health
20.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.