“Yi Jing” (“意境”, Ideological World) and the lyric subject as categories of comparative poetics

The aim of the research is to identify differences in the forms of expression of authorial consciousness in Russian and Chinese poetry. The focus of this article is on the universals of verbal-artistic thinking and the processes of national and cultural identification, which are manifested in the aesthetic conception of the world and man and determine the principles of studying the subject sphere of lyrics. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that, for the first time, based on a study of differences in the modes of thinking inherent in the Chinese and Western traditions, correlative to the subject forms of expression of authorial consciousness in Russian and European poetry are established categories of Chinese poetics that reflect the unity of the subjective and the objective. As a result of the research, it has been proven that regional differences in philosophical and ideological systems also form different types of poetics. Western dualism considers the relationship between man and nature as a relationship between subject and object. Eastern, in particular Chinese, philosophical monism perceives the relationship between man and nature as inter-subjective relationships. This led to the birth in Chinese poetics of the theory of “ideological world”, to which in Western aesthetics corresponds the doctrine of substance. The theory of the “ideological world”, developed by Wang Guowei, goes beyond the theory of subjectivity of Western existentialist philosophy, calling the subjectivity of Chinese culture with the academic term 无我 – non-being of the self. As another form of subjectivity, different from the world of “being of the self”, the world of “non-being of the self” requires a return to the Chinese philosophical tradition in order to understand its unique subtext. The results obtained can be used in constructing a comparative poetics of Russian and Chinese literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philology Theory & Practice
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20250593
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Yi Jing” (“意境”, Ideological World) and the lyric subject as categories of comparative poetics

Venera R. Amineva, Qiongqiong Tang
Philology Theory & Practice
Chinese history and philosophy
article

“Yi Jing” (“意境”, Ideological World) and the lyric subject as categories of comparative poetics

Venera R. Amineva, Qiongqiong Tang
article en

Abstract

The aim of the research is to identify differences in the forms of expression of authorial consciousness in Russian and Chinese poetry. The focus of this article is on the universals of verbal-artistic thinking and the processes of national and cultural identification, which are manifested in the aesthetic conception of the world and man and determine the principles of studying the subject sphere of lyrics. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that, for the first time, based on a study of differences in the modes of thinking inherent in the Chinese and Western traditions, correlative to the subject forms of expression of authorial consciousness in Russian and European poetry are established categories of Chinese poetics that reflect the unity of the subjective and the objective. As a result of the research, it has been proven that regional differences in philosophical and ideological systems also form different types of poetics. Western dualism considers the relationship between man and nature as a relationship between subject and object. Eastern, in particular Chinese, philosophical monism perceives the relationship between man and nature as inter-subjective relationships. This led to the birth in Chinese poetics of the theory of “ideological world”, to which in Western aesthetics corresponds the doctrine of substance. The theory of the “ideological world”, developed by Wang Guowei, goes beyond the theory of subjectivity of Western existentialist philosophy, calling the subjectivity of Chinese culture with the academic term 无我 – non-being of the self. As another form of subjectivity, different from the world of “being of the self”, the world of “non-being of the self” requires a return to the Chinese philosophical tradition in order to understand its unique subtext. The results obtained can be used in constructing a comparative poetics of Russian and Chinese literature.

Philology Theory & PracticeVol. 18(10)
Kazan Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.