Self‐ and peer‐assessment in upper secondary schools. A quasi‐experimental study to investigate the educational effectiveness of formative assessment

Abstract The assessment of student learning represents a key component of daily instructional practice. Formative assessment strategies are associated with the development and reinforcement of a series of skills linked to cognitive, metacognitive, behavioural and affective areas. This study investigated the effectiveness of formative assessment strategies in supporting the development of students' emotional and motivational capacities, resilience, self‐efficacy, self‐reflection, metacognitive awareness and self‐regulation. Specifically, it examined whether formative assessment strategies could enhance these skills and improve students' academic preparation for a summative mid‐term test. This quasi‐experimental study involved 581 students from 37 Italian upper secondary school classes in an investigation that tested the use of self‐ and peer‐assessment to support students' improvements in study organisation and effective summative test preparation. Findings indicate that formative assessment activities supported student preparation for a mid‐term summative test. Specifically, improvements in emotional attitudes, self‐efficacy, metacognitive awareness and aspects of self‐regulation related to rehearsal, elaboration and organisation of learning materials were reported. The data indicate that this skill development was attributed mainly to the implementation of a peer‐assessment strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self‐ and peer‐assessment in upper secondary schools. A quasi‐experimental study to investigate the educational effectiveness of formative assessment

Elisabetta Nicchia, Slaviša Radović, Emiliana Murgia, Davide Parmigiani et al.
1 citations
British Educational Research Journal
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
article

Self‐ and peer‐assessment in upper secondary schools. A quasi‐experimental study to investigate the educational effectiveness of formative assessment

Elisabetta Nicchia, Slaviša Radović, Emiliana Murgia, Davide Parmigiani, Myrna Pario, Marcea Ingersoll
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The assessment of student learning represents a key component of daily instructional practice. Formative assessment strategies are associated with the development and reinforcement of a series of skills linked to cognitive, metacognitive, behavioural and affective areas. This study investigated the effectiveness of formative assessment strategies in supporting the development of students' emotional and motivational capacities, resilience, self‐efficacy, self‐reflection, metacognitive awareness and self‐regulation. Specifically, it examined whether formative assessment strategies could enhance these skills and improve students' academic preparation for a summative mid‐term test. This quasi‐experimental study involved 581 students from 37 Italian upper secondary school classes in an investigation that tested the use of self‐ and peer‐assessment to support students' improvements in study organisation and effective summative test preparation. Findings indicate that formative assessment activities supported student preparation for a mid‐term summative test. Specifically, improvements in emotional attitudes, self‐efficacy, metacognitive awareness and aspects of self‐regulation related to rehearsal, elaboration and organisation of learning materials were reported. The data indicate that this skill development was attributed mainly to the implementation of a peer‐assessment strategy.

British Educational Research Journal
St. Thomas University (CA), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.