Investigation of Topsoil Salinity and Soil Texture Using the EM38-MK2 and the WET-2 Sensors in Greece

The electromagnetic induction (EMI) and frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) sensors, which measure the soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) in situ, have emerged as efficient and rapid tools for the indirect assessment of soil salinity, conventionally determined by the electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract (ECe). However, the limitations of applying a single soil sensor and the ECa dependence on multiple soil properties, such as soil moisture and texture, can hinder the interpretation of ECe, whereas selecting the most appropriate set of sensors is challenging. To address these issues, this study explored the prediction ability of a noninvasive EM38-MK2 (EMI) and a capacitance dielectric WET-2 probe (FDR) in assessing topsoil salinity and texture within 0–30 cm depth across diverse soil and land-use conditions in Laconia, Greece. To this aim, multiple linear regression models of laboratory-estimated ECe and soil texture were constructed by the in situ measurements of EM38-MK2 and WET-2, and their performances were individually evaluated using statistical metrics. As was shown, in heterogeneous soils with sufficient wetness and high salinity levels, both sensors produced models with high adjusted coefficients of determination (adj. R2 > 0.82) and low root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), indicating strong model fit and reliable estimations of topsoil salinity. For the EM38-MK2, model accuracy improved when clay was included in the regression, while for the WET-2, the soil pore water electrical conductivity (ECp) was the most accurate predictor. The drying soil surface was the greatest constraint to both sensors’ predictive performances, whereas in non-saline soils, the silt and sand were moderately assessed by the EM38-MK2 readings (0.49 < adj. R2 < 0.51). The results revealed that a complementary use of the contemporary EM38-MK2 and the low-cost WET-2 could provide an enhanced interpretation of the soil properties in the topsoil without the need for additional data acquisition, although more dense soil measurements are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7100347
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of Topsoil Salinity and Soil Texture Using the EM38-MK2 and the WET-2 Sensors in Greece

George Kargas, Κyriaki Sotirakoglou, Panagiota Antonia Petsetidi
2 citations
AgriEngineering
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
1.60
article

Investigation of Topsoil Salinity and Soil Texture Using the EM38-MK2 and the WET-2 Sensors in Greece

George Kargas, Κyriaki Sotirakoglou, Panagiota Antonia Petsetidi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The electromagnetic induction (EMI) and frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) sensors, which measure the soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) in situ, have emerged as efficient and rapid tools for the indirect assessment of soil salinity, conventionally determined by the electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract (ECe). However, the limitations of applying a single soil sensor and the ECa dependence on multiple soil properties, such as soil moisture and texture, can hinder the interpretation of ECe, whereas selecting the most appropriate set of sensors is challenging. To address these issues, this study explored the prediction ability of a noninvasive EM38-MK2 (EMI) and a capacitance dielectric WET-2 probe (FDR) in assessing topsoil salinity and texture within 0–30 cm depth across diverse soil and land-use conditions in Laconia, Greece. To this aim, multiple linear regression models of laboratory-estimated ECe and soil texture were constructed by the in situ measurements of EM38-MK2 and WET-2, and their performances were individually evaluated using statistical metrics. As was shown, in heterogeneous soils with sufficient wetness and high salinity levels, both sensors produced models with high adjusted coefficients of determination (adj. R2 > 0.82) and low root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), indicating strong model fit and reliable estimations of topsoil salinity. For the EM38-MK2, model accuracy improved when clay was included in the regression, while for the WET-2, the soil pore water electrical conductivity (ECp) was the most accurate predictor. The drying soil surface was the greatest constraint to both sensors’ predictive performances, whereas in non-saline soils, the silt and sand were moderately assessed by the EM38-MK2 readings (0.49 < adj. R2 < 0.51). The results revealed that a complementary use of the contemporary EM38-MK2 and the low-cost WET-2 could provide an enhanced interpretation of the soil properties in the topsoil without the need for additional data acquisition, although more dense soil measurements are recommended.

AgriEngineeringVol. 7(10)
Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.