Is Life Unlivable for Youth in Post-DEI America?: Understanding Rising Suicide Rates Across Diverse Youth Groups Through Traditional Suicide Paradigms

We pose the question of whether life has become unlivable for the young in America amidst the current political climate, which has systematically deregulated our social structures that safeguard against oppressive and unjust practices. What leads the young to become demoralized to the point of wanting to end their lives? Drawing on several established psychosocial models for suicide, including those of Durkheim, Joiner, and Butler, we highlight how groups of youth as disparate as youth of color, LGBTQ+ youth, and young men experience unique sociopolitical stressors that contribute to increased suicidality. We argue that despite differences in their contexts, they experience shared pathways to suicide. At a time when U.S. funding cuts threaten to dismantle the progress made in recent years to address structural racism and sexism, we also make a case for the importance of mental health clinicians' engagement in advocacy work that recognizes the sociopolitical influences on mental health and highlight universal school-based social emotional learning (USB SEL) as one beneficial intervention to target mental health outcomes across disparate youth groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13202585
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Life Unlivable for Youth in Post-DEI America?: Understanding Rising Suicide Rates Across Diverse Youth Groups Through Traditional Suicide Paradigms

Mimi Yen Li, Kalpana Nathan, Christina Mata
Healthcare
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Is Life Unlivable for Youth in Post-DEI America?: Understanding Rising Suicide Rates Across Diverse Youth Groups Through Traditional Suicide Paradigms

Mimi Yen Li, Kalpana Nathan, Christina Mata
article en

Abstract

We pose the question of whether life has become unlivable for the young in America amidst the current political climate, which has systematically deregulated our social structures that safeguard against oppressive and unjust practices. What leads the young to become demoralized to the point of wanting to end their lives? Drawing on several established psychosocial models for suicide, including those of Durkheim, Joiner, and Butler, we highlight how groups of youth as disparate as youth of color, LGBTQ+ youth, and young men experience unique sociopolitical stressors that contribute to increased suicidality. We argue that despite differences in their contexts, they experience shared pathways to suicide. At a time when U.S. funding cuts threaten to dismantle the progress made in recent years to address structural racism and sexism, we also make a case for the importance of mental health clinicians' engagement in advocacy work that recognizes the sociopolitical influences on mental health and highlight universal school-based social emotional learning (USB SEL) as one beneficial intervention to target mental health outcomes across disparate youth groups.

HealthcareVol. 13(20)
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.