Exploring Brazil's LLM Fauna: Investigating the Generative Performance of Large Language Models in Portuguese

Large Language Models (LLMs) are now embedded in widely used applications worldwide, yet their evaluation still centers on narrow, discriminative benchmarks. These pipelines often overlook key generative aspects such as discourse coherence, linguistic transformations, and adequacy, which are crucial for real-world applications. In addition, most large-scale evaluations remain heavily biased toward English, limiting our understanding of LLM performance in other languages. This research addresses these gaps by presenting a comprehensive analysis of Brazilian Portuguese LLMs across three core Natural Language Generation tasks: summarization, simplification, and generative question answering. We evaluate six Brazilian models and compare them to the widely used GPT-4o. Our findings, supported by diverse automatic metrics, an LLM-as-a-judge framework, and human evaluation, show that GPT-4o series achieves the best generative performance in Portuguese, followed closely by the Sabiá-3 family. While slightly behind, the open-weight model Tucano stands out for its computational efficiency, making it a strong candidate for deployment in resource-constrained settings. The code used to conduct all experiments is publicly available at https://github.com/MeLLL-UFF/brfauna-gen-eval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/jbcs.2025.5814
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Brazil's LLM Fauna: Investigating the Generative Performance of Large Language Models in Portuguese

Aline Paes, Cláudia Freitas, Gabriel Assis
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society
Topic Modeling
article

Exploring Brazil's LLM Fauna: Investigating the Generative Performance of Large Language Models in Portuguese

Aline Paes, Cláudia Freitas, Gabriel Assis
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are now embedded in widely used applications worldwide, yet their evaluation still centers on narrow, discriminative benchmarks. These pipelines often overlook key generative aspects such as discourse coherence, linguistic transformations, and adequacy, which are crucial for real-world applications. In addition, most large-scale evaluations remain heavily biased toward English, limiting our understanding of LLM performance in other languages. This research addresses these gaps by presenting a comprehensive analysis of Brazilian Portuguese LLMs across three core Natural Language Generation tasks: summarization, simplification, and generative question answering. We evaluate six Brazilian models and compare them to the widely used GPT-4o. Our findings, supported by diverse automatic metrics, an LLM-as-a-judge framework, and human evaluation, show that GPT-4o series achieves the best generative performance in Portuguese, followed closely by the Sabiá-3 family. While slightly behind, the open-weight model Tucano stands out for its computational efficiency, making it a strong candidate for deployment in resource-constrained settings. The code used to conduct all experiments is publicly available at https://github.com/MeLLL-UFF/brfauna-gen-eval.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer SocietyVol. 31(1)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.