Applying an Automatic Classifier for Child‐Directed Speech to Intervention Research: A Reanalysis

Parental language input is a key predictor of child language achievement. Parentese is a widely used style of child-directed speech (CDS) distinguished by a higher pitch and larger pitch range. A recent parent coaching randomized control trial (Parentese-RCT) demonstrated that English-speaking US parents who were coached to use parentese with their 6- to 18-month-olds increased the frequency of its use; their children showed enhanced language outcomes at 18 months. While these results are exciting, a roadblock in scaling this intervention is the fact that parentese has to be manually identified from daylong LENA recordings. Here we demonstrate that a newly developed CDS classifier captures the effect of this Parentese-RCT without human annotation, through a new variable: Proportion of CDS relative to all adult speech (CDS-Proportion). Two daylong recordings per child (N = 70) per timepoint (child age: 6, 10, 14, and 18 months) from the Parentese-RCT were re-analyzed by removing periods of sleep and estimating CDS-Proportion through the classifier. As was the case for parentese in the Parentese-RCT, CDS-Proportion was significantly enhanced in the intervention group. Moreover, the change over time in CDS-Proportion was significantly and positively correlated with infants' word use at 18 months. We emphasize that the classifier does not "recognize parentese." Likewise, CDS-Proportion is not a proxy for parentese, but rather, a variable related to parentese in complex ways. The present findings suggest a promising future for scalability of interventions using daylong recordings in combination with novel technologies. SUMMARY: Language interventions promote verbal engagement between caregivers and children; however, to be effective, these interventions need to be scalable. Language interventions have relied on manual (human) annotation to identify parental language behaviors that are linked to children's outcomes. An automated classifier for Child-Directed-Speech was applied to capture the effect of a previously published parent-coaching intervention, without human annotation. Novel technologies have the potential to enhance the scalability of parent interventions that focus on social language behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Science
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70079
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying an Automatic Classifier for Child‐Directed Speech to Intervention Research: A Reanalysis

Naja Ferjan Ramírez, Aeddan Claflin
Developmental Science
Language Development and Disorders
article

Applying an Automatic Classifier for Child‐Directed Speech to Intervention Research: A Reanalysis

Naja Ferjan Ramírez, Aeddan Claflin
article en

Abstract

Parental language input is a key predictor of child language achievement. Parentese is a widely used style of child-directed speech (CDS) distinguished by a higher pitch and larger pitch range. A recent parent coaching randomized control trial (Parentese-RCT) demonstrated that English-speaking US parents who were coached to use parentese with their 6- to 18-month-olds increased the frequency of its use; their children showed enhanced language outcomes at 18 months. While these results are exciting, a roadblock in scaling this intervention is the fact that parentese has to be manually identified from daylong LENA recordings. Here we demonstrate that a newly developed CDS classifier captures the effect of this Parentese-RCT without human annotation, through a new variable: Proportion of CDS relative to all adult speech (CDS-Proportion). Two daylong recordings per child (N = 70) per timepoint (child age: 6, 10, 14, and 18 months) from the Parentese-RCT were re-analyzed by removing periods of sleep and estimating CDS-Proportion through the classifier. As was the case for parentese in the Parentese-RCT, CDS-Proportion was significantly enhanced in the intervention group. Moreover, the change over time in CDS-Proportion was significantly and positively correlated with infants' word use at 18 months. We emphasize that the classifier does not "recognize parentese." Likewise, CDS-Proportion is not a proxy for parentese, but rather, a variable related to parentese in complex ways. The present findings suggest a promising future for scalability of interventions using daylong recordings in combination with novel technologies. SUMMARY: Language interventions promote verbal engagement between caregivers and children; however, to be effective, these interventions need to be scalable. Language interventions have relied on manual (human) annotation to identify parental language behaviors that are linked to children's outcomes. An automated classifier for Child-Directed-Speech was applied to capture the effect of a previously published parent-coaching intervention, without human annotation. Novel technologies have the potential to enhance the scalability of parent interventions that focus on social language behaviors.

Developmental ScienceVol. 28(6)
University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.