Ammianus Marcellinus’ first digression on the <i>mores</i> of the city of Rome (Amm. Marc. 14.6): intratextual and intertextual reflections

Abstract In this article, it is argued that Ammianus’ first Roman digression (14.6) should be interpreted as elucidating the political and philosophical mindset of the surrounding narrative to which it is tightly connected. This argumentative scope of the digression is activated through intra- and inter-textual references and allusions, especially to earlier Roman historiography. The latter orientate the reader to situate the often trivial behaviors discussed in the digression within a broader philosophical and historical framework, and to associate them with specific practices of Gallus and Constantius in the account immediately preceding and following the digression. Through these narrative devices, Ammianus affirms the mutual interaction between the mores of the principes in the main account and those of the nobiles and the lower classes in the digression. Through this case study it is thus demonstrated that the placement and content of digressions are much more carefully chosen than usually supposed, while also highlighting the important role of intra- and intertextuality in connecting the digression with the main narrative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philologus
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2024-0038
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ammianus Marcellinus’ first digression on the mores of the city of Rome (Amm. Marc. 14.6): intratextual and intertextual reflections

Georgios Vassiliades
Philologus
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Ammianus Marcellinus’ first digression on the mores of the city of Rome (Amm. Marc. 14.6): intratextual and intertextual reflections

Georgios Vassiliades
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, it is argued that Ammianus’ first Roman digression (14.6) should be interpreted as elucidating the political and philosophical mindset of the surrounding narrative to which it is tightly connected. This argumentative scope of the digression is activated through intra- and inter-textual references and allusions, especially to earlier Roman historiography. The latter orientate the reader to situate the often trivial behaviors discussed in the digression within a broader philosophical and historical framework, and to associate them with specific practices of Gallus and Constantius in the account immediately preceding and following the digression. Through these narrative devices, Ammianus affirms the mutual interaction between the mores of the principes in the main account and those of the nobiles and the lower classes in the digression. Through this case study it is thus demonstrated that the placement and content of digressions are much more carefully chosen than usually supposed, while also highlighting the important role of intra- and intertextuality in connecting the digression with the main narrative.

PhilologusVol. 169(2)
University of Cyprus (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ammianus Marcellinus’ first digression on the <i>mores</i> of the city of Rome (Amm. Marc. 14.6): intratextual and intertextual reflections — Georgios Vassiliades · Philologus (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS