Performance analysis of the most downloaded Turkish and English language models on the Hugging-Face platform

This study analyzes the performance of the most popularly downloaded language models on the Hugging Face platform. For this purpose, the five most downloaded language models in Turkish and English were used. The analysis was evaluated in three phases. These stages were contextual learning, question and answer, and expert evaluation. ARC, Turkish sentiment analysis, Hellaswag, and MMLU datasets were used for contextual learning. For the question-and-answer test, the models trained with the text file created were asked questions from the text. Finally, six experts evaluated the answers given by the models from the developed mobile application. F1 score was used for context evaluation, Rouge-1, Rouge-2, and Rouge-L metrics were used for question and answer, and Elo and TrueSkill metrics were used for expert evaluations. The correlations of these metrics were calculated, and it was seen that there was a correlation of 0.74 between expert evaluations and question-answer performances. It was also observed that learning in context and question-answering performances were not correlated. When the language models were evaluated in general, the timpal0l/mdeberta-v3-base-squad2 language model performed the best. Turkish and English language models performed best on the sentiment analysis dataset with an F1 score above 0.85.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Reports-A
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1599759
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance analysis of the most downloaded Turkish and English language models on the Hugging-Face platform

İnayet Hakkı Çizmeci, Kerem Gencer
Journal of Scientific Reports-A
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Performance analysis of the most downloaded Turkish and English language models on the Hugging-Face platform

İnayet Hakkı Çizmeci, Kerem Gencer
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the performance of the most popularly downloaded language models on the Hugging Face platform. For this purpose, the five most downloaded language models in Turkish and English were used. The analysis was evaluated in three phases. These stages were contextual learning, question and answer, and expert evaluation. ARC, Turkish sentiment analysis, Hellaswag, and MMLU datasets were used for contextual learning. For the question-and-answer test, the models trained with the text file created were asked questions from the text. Finally, six experts evaluated the answers given by the models from the developed mobile application. F1 score was used for context evaluation, Rouge-1, Rouge-2, and Rouge-L metrics were used for question and answer, and Elo and TrueSkill metrics were used for expert evaluations. The correlations of these metrics were calculated, and it was seen that there was a correlation of 0.74 between expert evaluations and question-answer performances. It was also observed that learning in context and question-answering performances were not correlated. When the language models were evaluated in general, the timpal0l/mdeberta-v3-base-squad2 language model performed the best. Turkish and English language models performed best on the sentiment analysis dataset with an F1 score above 0.85.

Journal of Scientific Reports-A(061)
Afyon Kocatepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.