Radiological characterization for future fusion reactor decommissioning: balancing accuracy, time, and radiation protection

Abstract Future fusion reactors will produce radioactive waste, primarily neutron activation products and tritium, necessitating robust decommissioning strategies. This study compares radiological characterization techniques for fusion waste management, focusing on destructive versus non-destructive methods, and evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of both by applying them to two case studies of nuclear fusion plant decommissioning, namely the ENEA Frascati Tokamak Upgrade (FTU) and the planned ITER, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. Gamma emitters can be readily quantified using solid-state detectors, while almost pure beta emitters like Fe-55 and Ni-59 traditionally require destructive methods. However, for ITER-scale inventories, Cadmium Telluride (CdTe)-based X-ray spectrometry offers a viable non-destructive alternative, combining good energy resolution, compactness, and potential reduced secondary waste. In contrast, the FTU decommissioning, which is a peculiar case due to its stringent clearance levels for material reuse and recycling (below 1E+03 Bq/kg), necessitates destructive methods for nuclides such as Fe-55 and Ni-59 because non-destructive X-ray spectrometry would require impractically long measurement times. This comparative analysis highlights the importance of tailored characterization approaches, balancing accuracy, efficiency, and radiation protection, and provides insights applicable to decommissioning in different nuclear facilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal Plus
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06896-8
Primary Topic
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiological characterization for future fusion reactor decommissioning: balancing accuracy, time, and radiation protection

G. A. Marzo, Luigi Lepore, Gian Marco Contessa
The European Physical Journal Plus
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
article

Radiological characterization for future fusion reactor decommissioning: balancing accuracy, time, and radiation protection

G. A. Marzo, Luigi Lepore, Gian Marco Contessa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Future fusion reactors will produce radioactive waste, primarily neutron activation products and tritium, necessitating robust decommissioning strategies. This study compares radiological characterization techniques for fusion waste management, focusing on destructive versus non-destructive methods, and evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of both by applying them to two case studies of nuclear fusion plant decommissioning, namely the ENEA Frascati Tokamak Upgrade (FTU) and the planned ITER, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. Gamma emitters can be readily quantified using solid-state detectors, while almost pure beta emitters like Fe-55 and Ni-59 traditionally require destructive methods. However, for ITER-scale inventories, Cadmium Telluride (CdTe)-based X-ray spectrometry offers a viable non-destructive alternative, combining good energy resolution, compactness, and potential reduced secondary waste. In contrast, the FTU decommissioning, which is a peculiar case due to its stringent clearance levels for material reuse and recycling (below 1E+03 Bq/kg), necessitates destructive methods for nuclides such as Fe-55 and Ni-59 because non-destructive X-ray spectrometry would require impractically long measurement times. This comparative analysis highlights the importance of tailored characterization approaches, balancing accuracy, efficiency, and radiation protection, and provides insights applicable to decommissioning in different nuclear facilities.

The European Physical Journal PlusVol. 140(10)
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (IT), National Institute of Health (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.