Reimagining “Public” Outreach on Environmental Issues: Interrogating the Hegemonic Foundations of Public Engagement/Participation/Relations

Public outreach is now ubiquitous in environmental decision-making processes. However, institutionally-led engagement often retains power in the hands of the elite to decide the agenda and process. This creates a disconnect between the goal of strengthening democratic processes and actual outcomes, perpetuating inequalities between colonizing elites and Indigenous peoples in addressing environmental crises. We argue that public outreach for better environmental outcomes has been ineffective because it embodies a democratic imaginary bound up in hegemonic western ontology, epistemology, and temporality. We present a different starting point for public participation by considering questions raised by Indigenous ontologies, epistemologies and temporalities in the quest for truly equitable outcomes. The article lays the foundation for reframing environmental communication as a process where meaning is co-created by diverse participants with different ways of knowing and being, different sources of knowledge, and different understandings of time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Communication
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2025.2571946
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining “Public” Outreach on Environmental Issues: Interrogating the Hegemonic Foundations of Public Engagement/Participation/Relations

Lee Edwards, Debashish Munshi, Priya Kurian
Environmental Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Reimagining “Public” Outreach on Environmental Issues: Interrogating the Hegemonic Foundations of Public Engagement/Participation/Relations

Lee Edwards, Debashish Munshi, Priya Kurian
article en

Abstract

Public outreach is now ubiquitous in environmental decision-making processes. However, institutionally-led engagement often retains power in the hands of the elite to decide the agenda and process. This creates a disconnect between the goal of strengthening democratic processes and actual outcomes, perpetuating inequalities between colonizing elites and Indigenous peoples in addressing environmental crises. We argue that public outreach for better environmental outcomes has been ineffective because it embodies a democratic imaginary bound up in hegemonic western ontology, epistemology, and temporality. We present a different starting point for public participation by considering questions raised by Indigenous ontologies, epistemologies and temporalities in the quest for truly equitable outcomes. The article lays the foundation for reframing environmental communication as a process where meaning is co-created by diverse participants with different ways of knowing and being, different sources of knowledge, and different understandings of time.

Environmental Communication
University of Waikato (NZ), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
University of Waikato, London School of Economics and Political Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.