‘They want You to Read Their Work’: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on the Use of AI for School Feedback

Abstract Providing feedback is time-consuming for teachers, but new Artificial Intelligence tools aim to reduce this burden and improve feedback quality. We asked teachers ( N = 12) to trial an AI tool for providing feedback on students’ work. In semi-structured interviews they reflected on the positive and negative implications of such tools. In focus groups, secondary school students ( N = 9) also shared their views on the use of AI feedback tools. Results showed that teachers believed AI tools could save time and reduce subjectivity in the feedback process. However, they also shared concerns about these tools’ potential impact on teacher-student relationships, their ability to meet individual students’ needs, and a potential deskilling of the teaching workforce. Many of these views were largely echoed by students in our sample. We conclude that AI tools for feedback are promising but need further development, and should include teachers’ and students’ voices as key to this work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology Knowledge and Learning
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09903-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘They want You to Read Their Work’: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on the Use of AI for School Feedback

Robert A. Nash, Ellen Turner, Lewis Doyle, Viktoria Jakcsiova
1 citations
Technology Knowledge and Learning
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

‘They want You to Read Their Work’: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on the Use of AI for School Feedback

Robert A. Nash, Ellen Turner, Lewis Doyle, Viktoria Jakcsiova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Providing feedback is time-consuming for teachers, but new Artificial Intelligence tools aim to reduce this burden and improve feedback quality. We asked teachers ( N = 12) to trial an AI tool for providing feedback on students’ work. In semi-structured interviews they reflected on the positive and negative implications of such tools. In focus groups, secondary school students ( N = 9) also shared their views on the use of AI feedback tools. Results showed that teachers believed AI tools could save time and reduce subjectivity in the feedback process. However, they also shared concerns about these tools’ potential impact on teacher-student relationships, their ability to meet individual students’ needs, and a potential deskilling of the teaching workforce. Many of these views were largely echoed by students in our sample. We conclude that AI tools for feedback are promising but need further development, and should include teachers’ and students’ voices as key to this work.

Technology Knowledge and LearningVol. 30(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Surrey (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage (FR), Faculty of Public Health (GB), University of Greenwich (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘They want You to Read Their Work’: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on the Use of AI for School Feedback — Robert A. Nash, Ellen Turner, et al. · Technology Knowledge and Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS