Droop-based co-ordination of grid-forming and grid-following inverters ensuring stability in a microgrid

This paper presents the droop-based co-ordination for active and reactive power-sharing between grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) inverters. A 12 MVA inverter-based microgrid with two photovoltaic (PV) systems, 1 km apart is simulated to analyze the impact of different inverter control strategies on power-sharing and microgrid’s frequency response. Three simulation cases are studied for different combinations of GFM and GFL inverters, keeping the total PV headroom same (4 MVA) for regulation in all cases. Two grid-supporting GFM units (2 MVA headroom on each unit) in parallel operation results in 61% RoCoF reduction and 0.54 Hz less frequency nadir as compared to the case when one grid-supporting GFM operates in parallel with a grid-supporting GFL unit. When a GFL unit is operating together with a GFM unit, the choice of droop coefficients, inverter control mode and headroom capacity allocation plays a crucial role in overall frequency response. A grid-supporting GFM unit (4 MVA headroom capacity) in parallel with a grid-feeding GFL unit provides comparatively improved damping and frequency response with 39% reduction in RoCoF and 0.42 Hz improvement in the frequency nadir as compared to the case when both GFM and GFL units in parallel regulate the frequency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2025.2283
Primary Topic
Microgrid Control and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Droop-based co-ordination of grid-forming and grid-following inverters ensuring stability in a microgrid

Sami Repo, Lasse Peltonen, Nida Riaz, Pertti Järventausta
IET conference proceedings.
Microgrid Control and Optimization
article

Droop-based co-ordination of grid-forming and grid-following inverters ensuring stability in a microgrid

Sami Repo, Lasse Peltonen, Nida Riaz, Pertti Järventausta
article en

Abstract

This paper presents the droop-based co-ordination for active and reactive power-sharing between grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) inverters. A 12 MVA inverter-based microgrid with two photovoltaic (PV) systems, 1 km apart is simulated to analyze the impact of different inverter control strategies on power-sharing and microgrid’s frequency response. Three simulation cases are studied for different combinations of GFM and GFL inverters, keeping the total PV headroom same (4 MVA) for regulation in all cases. Two grid-supporting GFM units (2 MVA headroom on each unit) in parallel operation results in 61% RoCoF reduction and 0.54 Hz less frequency nadir as compared to the case when one grid-supporting GFM operates in parallel with a grid-supporting GFL unit. When a GFL unit is operating together with a GFM unit, the choice of droop coefficients, inverter control mode and headroom capacity allocation plays a crucial role in overall frequency response. A grid-supporting GFM unit (4 MVA headroom capacity) in parallel with a grid-feeding GFL unit provides comparatively improved damping and frequency response with 39% reduction in RoCoF and 0.42 Hz improvement in the frequency nadir as compared to the case when both GFM and GFL units in parallel regulate the frequency.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2025(14)
Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Microgrid Control and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.